what if it is Noah's Ark

Discussion in 'Politics' started by qdz3se, Apr 26, 2004.

  1. I was simply pointing out that many Christians do not stop to consider the context. Again, it's easy to forget - I'm not slamming anyone. It is just so difficult to get outside our culture and biases...
     
    #71     Apr 27, 2004
  2. Where is the atheism trifecta (Rowenwood, Axeman and Longshot). I see we have Gordon Gekko providing some amazingly sharp proofs that god doesn't exist, but I was hoping for a more jew-turned-nihilist opinion (Rowenwood).
     
    #72     Apr 27, 2004
  3. Who are you to decide how god should or should not act?
     
    #73     Apr 27, 2004
  4. Faith has no legitimacy from your perspective, nor perhaps the perspective of material science, yet that doesn't mean that is has no legitimacy.

    You are hardly the ultimate authority on what is or is not legitimate when it comes to human experience.

    Were we computers, bound by only the digital processing of linear and relativistic logic, I would agree with your conclusion.

    However, we are more than computers with more than limited senses and relativistic intellect at our disposal.

    You have made so many references in the past to validation on the basis of scientific "fact" as to make your present denial of science validating anything quite Kerryesque.


     
    #74     Apr 27, 2004
  5. I'm blown away cuzz it's the first time I haven't my intellect and a couple dozen expletives placed together in a "relgious" discussion...
     
    #75     Apr 27, 2004
  6. This is the vanity of the atheist, that they denounce the existence of God, and at the same time have a faith of how God should, could, or would act.

    How absurd that they would claim to know more about how God should act than God Himself, given that God is understood to be an Omniscient, Omnipresent, and Eternal Personality.

    Given it is by the limits of their intellect that they evaluate and judge God, is it any wonder that they never find Him?



     
    #76     Apr 27, 2004
  7. damir00

    damir00 Guest

    only in an exceedingly simple world/universe.
     
    #77     Apr 27, 2004
  8. Turok

    Turok

    "god" can act however he wishes. I will only respect a "god worth his salt" however.

    JB

     
    #78     Apr 27, 2004
  9. damir00

    damir00 Guest

    because it would make for a piss poor flood story if someone wasn't floating around in a boat while everything was being drowned, obviously. these are *stories* first and foremost: before you can hope to take them seriously as moral object lessons, you have to treat them as literature. a story needs a plot, it needs drama, it needs action.

    a wave of a ex machina hand would make for a damn boring - not to mention short - story.
     
    #79     Apr 27, 2004
  10. damir00

    damir00 Guest

    but there are many mountains *of* ararat because it is also the name of an entire range of mountains. Beresheit specifically avoids saying the ark came to rest on ararat - it says "the mountains [plural] *of* ararat.
     
    #80     Apr 27, 2004