"Less damage" just ain't good enough, brother AK. Your vote and enthusiasm for any particular candidate should be measured according to a much higher standard. Whores weren't made to be voted for. That's why this year, we needed brother Ron Paul. (Paul is not a Democrat; not a "modern day" Republican.)
As I mentioned, it's not less damage at all. It's just the rate of increase which is less - not the damage. That's like saying you only hit someone 1.4% harder than the guy who hit him before you. That's not less damage.
Wow! I didn't see this post before what I wrote. Come on, my fellow conservatives, brother AK does deserve some credit for this post.
I've said it before brother BSAM.While I side with dems on most economic and social issues I side with libertarians on cutting defense spending,The US no longer being the world police,no wars unless the US is attacked,ending the drug war,civil liberties etc I dont side with neocons on anything I can think of
Except for the fact that Obama and Paul are such polar opposites in so many things, it just doesn't pass the smell test.
Brother Captain Obvious and brother AAA need to weigh in on this thread. I'm surprised they haven't shown up.
no, he is crazy old coot whose policies if enacted would take us back to a 1937 depression. his ideas were soundly rejected. this was his best chance to sell his vision for america and less than 5% of americans even took him seriously.
Well, as a general rule, I don't take stock in Democrats or Republicans. I'm a real, thinking conservative. My Republican party no longer exists.