I still don't understand how you can say I am a charlatan. I have a degree in a relevant area. I can computer programme. I write financial calculations. I have written papers for institutions. The list goes on. It is a serious skill base, which although you might not view my work a good the skills taken to produce it are good. For example I wrote a taxation computer programme. It was sent to the Ministry of Finance in the Czech Republic. That would indicate I have sufficient skills and acknowledgement of that skill was made when the model was sent. Have you ever done something like this.
citation pls? I'd be very interested in reading about this - though, I doubt you'll move pass HR at MS or JPM with this opener. Good for them. You don't. Quit trying to brag about the potential of nepotism. Because you are a charlatan - And it incenses me to no end that you try to pass off your ignorance as insight. I find you distasteful as Penn & Teller finds the andrew wakefield (and the anti-vaccination people) so distasteful. But I'm no magician. People who are lost usually don't think they are; People who know they are lost try to find a direction. I don't need validation from anonymous internet people to feel creative. I am indeed attacking you, as a charlatan who advertises his ignorance as knowledge to people who might not know better. I persecute this with some glee.
So do the hundreds of thousands of BAs in economics. So do the hundreds of thousands of BSs in Computer science. Neither of them are qualified (nor do they usually pretend to) 'invent' new macroeconomic theories. Great. Are they accepted by peer review journals? Are they presented at monetary conferences? Has anyone read them? Super. Was it solicited? I also don't know what writing a taxation program has to do with macro economic theory. I doubt the chief programmer at TurboTax is qualified either. Only in your world.
How can you possibly say someone is a charlatan if you have not read their work. Anyway here is that citation you wanted. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoclassical_synthesis I suspect you will disagree with either me or the concept itself. I am tired of this. It is producing nothing. I think you are just trying to frustrate me. You did say you get please from this.
No, apologies, I meant the study that says you having a common last name (or, as you said, your 'genes') gives you some special advantage in the field.
The comment you made about my family was different and underneath the citation you made. You clearly meant the citation about the neoclassical synthesis. Which means you did not know what it is which means you do not know about macro economic theory. This is one of main concepts in economic theory and not knowing it is like not knowing what monetarist or keynesian is. You are the charlatan not me. This is now over. You are clearly trolling.
That's entirely my fault, I bracketed the wrong part of the quote and didn't notice. If you want to some how argue that a clear mistake (asking for citation pointing to a wikipedia link) as evidence of not knowing any macoeconomics, go for it.
Boon on BLOOMBERG.....KEEP TALKING BABY!!!!! Tell the Sheeople and the Scum bag Politicans the truth! Boon baby, you are gona make my year this year one of the best ever!!!! Tell the idiots that China has spent over 200 billion securing oil producing fields around the world. Tell the idiots that we have lost men and spent billions on the war in Iraq and CHINA gets the oil! Tell these fucking bleeding heart idiots in America that they are beyond fucked because we do not take care of our own business. Tell them that we buy OIL from the Enemies, only feeding them with more wealth to destroy us. And best of all , TELL THE IDIOTS IN THE US that WE DRILL and WE FIND OIL!!!!!!!!
For the record, I meant to quote this part of your post: "In relation to the surname. Assuming there is no link. though there is evidence to suggest there is. "
No why would then have another response relating to my family which said, Quote from morganist: That doesn't detract from my immediate family. Who all worked in relevant fields. [/B] "Good for them. You don't. Quit trying to brag about the potential of nepotism." You would not have put that if you wanted a citation of my family. Also how can I give you a citation of my family. What do you want birth certificates. I could give you a citation to neoclassical synthesis. This is clearly what you meant. You have been caught out.