What does winning the war on terrorism look like?

If you stop denying that you acted like a jackass and began flaming me, and ask civilly, I may accommodate your request.

 

Are you gonne sit there and act some little bitch who just got felt up at prom?

Dude...man the fuck up and answer the question!@!

 

So you do not deny that you're being a jackass and you started with the flaming......dude?

 

hapa...you have no answer to the basic question..."what does American Victory in Iraq look like?"

No problem....neither does any other kook job who's for this war.

 

There you go again with more flaming.

I do have an answer: Once you admit you've been a jackass and initiated the flame war, and then ask civilly, I'll forgive your antics and answer you.

 

You have no coherent answer to the question of “What does American Victory in Iraq look like?”

 

To repeat the same basic queation " What does American Victory in Iraq look like?"....again and again to right-wing robots seems to render them null and void.

I hereby Trademark the phrase "What does American Victory in Iraq look like?" (tm)

It'll be all over the political adds...

 

I do have an answer: Once you admit you've been a jackass and initiated the flame war, and then ask civilly, I'll forgive your antics and answer you.

Man up and admit your folly, and an answer you shall receive.

 

According to the Logical Positivist's dictionary to PC words and terms:

War on terrorism: fight for empire

One can not have war on an abstract noun. War can only exist between 2 or more entities.

But if you substitute fight (as trying to achieve) for empire (a goal, a result) for war on terror, the whole thing start to make sense, and you guys can actually have a decent conversation.

Enjoy!!

P.S.: So the title question would be like this:

What does it take to achieve complete emperial status for the US?

 

Since you brought it up, what does a "right-wing robot" look like and believe?

(Note how I asked you civilly)

Thank you,
H