Please cease and desist with your flaming. If you cannot act in a civil manner, please do not post anything at all.
Hi Z Can you explain the apparent contradiction here? You are repeatedly asking another member not to respond to your posts, cluttering the thread. But you also say that you can post whenever you feel like it. How does this work, exactly? You have been told repeatedly that you should put people on ignore if you don't want to see their responses to your posts. Why is it that you haven't done so? Is it because it would involve every member of ET save one if you chose to put on ignore everyone who questions your posts? Also, you have yet to respond to hapaboys very generous offer to bury the hatchet by simply making an apology for an act on your part which has been universally condemned by the administration of ET and by all the members who became aware of it except one. Do you have any response? Any clarifications are appreciated. Thank you Nik
Hi Z So you don't think it's contradictory for you to say on one hand that you can post 'whenever you feel like it' but on the other hand tell hapaboy not to respond to your posts?
So you do not think that it's contradictory? http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=contradiction Hmmm... your statements seem to fit the dictionary definition of contradiction. So it doesn't look like it's only me who finds it contradictory! Any comment or guidance at all? Also, there are several other outstanding questions engendered by your posts. Right now one of the most current is your lack of response to hapaboy. He has made a generous offer to bury the hatchet. All you need to do is to make an apology for an immoral act of cowardice which was universally condemned here on ET by both members and the administration, except for one member who may have supported it. Do you have any response?
Guidance? Seek help for your experiences of something contradictory if they distrub you. If they are not a problem for you, that is fine too...
Hi Z Well, it's not really that they disturb me. As you can imagine, it is my opinion that you make a lot of contradictory statements here. I guess I just feel that when you make statements that are contradictory, it is necessary to point it out and try to get some clarification from you. In this case it's pretty clear. 1) You say that you can post whenever you want 2) You tell other members that they cannot post whenever they want. As I mentioned, the point is not that this seems contradictory to me personally. That's why I posted that definition, since the position you are taking on this issue is contradictory by definition. The question that arises is this (just to make it perfectly clear). If you claim the right to post whenever you want, why would you deny that right to another member? I will try to make it clearer to you if you want, but maybe this is enough to make my point clear to you. Any guidance is appreciated.