No and that's not the case now either without any crappy "fair tax" scheme. That's the whole point, taxing consumption is not any more or less fair than taxing income or wealth, calling the proposal "fair tax" is therefore yet another conservative orwellinan misnomer.
This proclaimed "Fair" Tax sounds like Steve Forbes' flat tax. Here's an article on mises taking apart Forbes' Folly: Flat Tax Folly Do a search on mises.org and you'll find problems with every new idea of a "fair" tax thats been popping up.
'Yawn' Apparently you won't be satisfied until you are able to specifically direct where your taxes go, and the poor who use most government services are taxed higher than you. Call the proposal what you will, but IMO it will do wonders for our economy, increase savings and home ownership, and abolish a horrendous tax system with loopholes you Libs love to scream about. Too bad you only see things with a partisan perspective.
Yes, with such missives such as: "...why not cut federal spending in half and at the same time cut federal income tax rates by an appropriate amount? Too drastic? How about an incremental approach: Cut spending by 10 percent each year and cut taxes each year to match it." Cut federal spending in half.....sure. I'm sure the Libs are all for cutting programs like welfare, Medicare, etc....
Right, all that debt created under Raygun and Generalissimo Bush was a result of welfare, Medicare, etc.... Vote republican and its nothing more than enriching special interests at the expense of taxpayers. Then again, why even bother with controlling spending, Cheney says deficits don't matter.
Railing against Bush & Cheney does nothing to bolster your argument. How will a Democratic President, if elected, cut federal spending in half?!? Are you saying welfare, Medicare, and the plethora of programs helping the less fortunate, programs Libs claim are their stock in trade, will not be cut in the process?
no one bit before so I will specifically ask the question. Since many say we are a hollowed out service economy and other countries have abused free trade. Would it not be much safer now to erect tariffs since we are a huge net importer. Drop the income tax and raise revenues with tarriffs with a consumption tax waiting in the wings in case of short falls. All those chinesse products would cost us more but the money would go to the feds. We would have more to spend and domestic manufacturers could compete. What is wrong with that scenario, anything?
What would make the other countries not put tariffs on the US goods ? Recall the steel tariffs of 2002. Once Japan and Europe said they would put tarriffs on US goods, Bush dropped the steel tariffs.
Nothing would stop them. But who would get the most benefit? Those countries already have benefited from their less than free trade export agendas. I would be interested in a some sort of analysis about what would happen to the U.S. economy if every country put up a 20 percent tariff.