Thats right. And while these things need to be addressed on an incident by incident basis, Ms. Babbit was shot in view of dozens of witnesses and with multiple recording angles. You can literally see her trying to break through glass, trying to attack a secured location where dozens of people were the mob was seeking to kill.
Who shot her? What was the skin color of the person who shot babbitt and what was their personal history and history or prior disciplinary actions, political affiliations, and social media contacts and statements? You know. Just basic stuff for whenever police officer kills a lefty.
Funny, when BLM thugs get shot by police, there is full out investigation including, the FBI and DOJ coming out in force? A white woman who is a veteran gets shot by police and extreme liberal politicians hide the cop's identify and automatically, excuse him from liability. No, investigation whatsoever. Another criminal act by the Democrats in power. Atleast, her survivors should hire a good attorney and sue the Federal Government for damages in the tens of millions. Won't bring her back but, a measure of justice to have the truth put out there and that guilty police officer charged.
For those who never learned this in school; or who believe that you should join a party based on what they used to represent, versus what they currently represent; or who believe other silly gop talking points. ..... More: https://www.history.com/news/how-the-party-of-lincoln-won-over-the-once-democratic-south
The old switcharoo trick...A common tactic of any criminal suspect Aside from Presidential vote it took anywhere from 20-40 years to flush out the racist Democratics from the US senate down to local state office holders. if there was a switch it wouldn't take 40 years and two generations to change Few elected racist democrats switched but instead they died out And now the new South is all republican and receiving neglected Blacks from the remaining racist Democrats in the northern cities
The current Republican party represents the racist South. Before the switch, The then Democratic party represented the racist South. Whether you accept history or not doesn't concern me too much. But I can see how you've confused yourself. More: https://www.newyorker.com/news/dail...n-party-racial-hypocrisy-and-the-1619-project More: https://www.chicagotribune.com/colu...n-republican-party-racism-20190114-story.html More: https://time.com/5628283/trump-tweets-racist-white-america/ Now you cite some contrary sources, then we'll repeat.
Why don't you read your links, learn them then write your own persuasive posts I am not going to read links that you don't even take the time to read yourself All I am saying is that very few of the the racist southern democrats switched to republican...It took a new generation of people to save the south
Whether they switched or died out is a distinction without a difference. The discussion is about The South, and the parties; not individual lawmakers who were alive during the transition. 1. The South has been, and is racist. 2. The South was first represented by the name: "Democrats." 3. The South was later represented by the name: "Republicans." Whatever you want to call the south, in whichever time frame, they are/were more racist than the North. ---"What's in a name? That which we call a rose, by any other name, would smell just as sweet."
Democracy Education Stronger Economy/ Greater Opportunity and Participation Less Regulatory Capture Less Corruption Civil Rights/ Civil liberty Stronger Social Safety Net Social Security Medicare Environmental Protection Workers Rights Over Regulation Inefficiency