typical democrat, you confuse society with government and think they are one and the same. The catholic church has provided support for woman and adoption services long before you ever had a government abortion clinic.
Don't be suckers guys. Do your own due diligence. This kind of crap is becoming endemic. Don't fall fall for it. Does it seem unreasonable to you? If so, it very likely is .
I was willing to bet planned parenthood probably offered some pre natal care to give cover to democrat lies. But... I was not so sure I could prove it. but... snopes says Although Planned Parenthood does provide prenatal care services, those services are not a primary part of their operation. According to organization’s annual report for 2014-2015, they only provided 17,419 instances of prenatal care services (compared to 3,533,522 STD tests and 323,999 abortions.) and if snopes is willing to put up that as a leftists defense... I suspect that is the best there is for left.
What on earth are you talking about ? 50% of society is women, and the majority of women consider the Catholic Church to be a negative influence on the planet. Of those who do believe in the Catholic Church, the majority of those believe the Catholic Church's public policy on women's issues is not to be supported. If you are male, you don't get to decide. Period. Mentioning adoption services is only a positive if someone actually wants to consider that option. It would be a positive except the very same people often try to demonize early pregnancy abortions that are also a valid option. And those who describe the killing of thousands of "babies" are in a word ignorant, bringing back 1950s type thinking when it's 2017.
Do you think that there should be an age limit? If yes, at what point during pregnancy is the fetus a person or baby? If no, what is your definition of a person/baby? http://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/j...y-daughter-continues-her-miraculous-recovery/ Back in January, J.R. Smith and his wife, Jewel, announced some difficult news: Their baby girl, Dakota, had been born five months early.
The only thing that matters on this is that Planned Parenthood provides a service that many women in the nation want. In terms of subsidies, the reason subsidies are needed is because people at risk can't get life altering procedures due to financial stress or overly zealous religious factions. If a vote was held involving all women in the US about whether Planned Parenthood and similar agencies should exist and be funded, it would easily pass. Your vote doesn't count. Nor should it ever count, you could never become pregnant.
That is something the medical community can decide provided they avoid the negatives of overly religious influences. A prospective mother can consult with impartial people who do know the facts and decide for themselves what option is best for them. My opinion only matters in
So if a mother decided to abort at 9 months, you are okay with that? If a baby can survive when born, how is it not a baby/person? If a baby is 8 months in the womb, what exactly is different about the baby inside and outside the womb? Is that the only difference? Just the location of the baby? Does location determine personhood? If a baby can survive outside the womb, how is it not a civil rights violation to kill it? Also, how does killing an 8 month old baby not violate the below: The Declaration of Independence proclaims as a self-evident truth the First Principle that “all men are endowed, by their Creator, with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”