What CTA fee structure you like the most?

Discussion in 'Professional Trading' started by dabao91, Sep 23, 2007.

What Fee Structure you like the most?

  1. 1.

    6 vote(s)
    11.5%
  2. 2.

    2 vote(s)
    3.8%
  3. 3.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. 4.

    1 vote(s)
    1.9%
  1. NTB

    NTB

    If you don't know the answer to this question, you won't make it as a CTA. By the way, I'll take 5% management fee, no incentive all day long. Anyone who didn't vote for that, doesn't have a clue about the business. As an investor, you take 0/25 with high water if you plan on being a long-term investor, you take 0/20 if you are going to redeem on poor performance.
     
    #11     Sep 24, 2007
  2. Exactly - a flat 5% fee is only advantageous to the CTA. If you are trying to attract new clients, this is a terrible idea. It's great for you, but if you are taking 5% of 0, it doesn't mean anything.

    As I said, a 5% CTA is a really expensive mutual fund. Your goal is to collect assets and keep them as long as possible. That's it. You just need to make enough to keep people around.

    Some sort of incentive fee puts you on the same team as your investors and is an easier sell. There is a reason why many CTA's and hedge funds are set up this way. You are not the first person to think about just charging a ridiculous management fee, regardless of performance.
     
    #12     Sep 24, 2007
  3. Yes ! As far as I am informed RENTEC´s Simmons is charging 3 % management fee and 44 % incentive fee !
     
    #13     Sep 24, 2007
  4. dabao91

    dabao91

    Do you have their web-site?

    Thanks.
     
    #14     Sep 24, 2007
  5. dabao91

    dabao91

    It looks like at least ONE like option 1 " 5%/0% --- only 5% management fee, no incentive fee".

    For the one who voted for option 1, would you mind to share your thoughts?

    Why option 1? What is your reason? Please share your opinion.

    Thanks.
     
    #15     Sep 24, 2007
  6. NTB

    NTB

    It's obvious. I voted from a CTA perspective. Your breakeven would be 25% gross return at a 0/20, a 20% gross return at 0/25 and a 15% gross return at 2/20. No matter how confident you are in your system, those numbers are unrealistic over any length of time and capital base. Keep in mind, those are breakeven numbers just to receive the 5%. Another poster made a point about capital raising difficulties related to the different fee structures, etc. However, I think the question is not that involved and merely asks about fee structure. Marketability is certainly a concern and if marketing is a concern, 2/20 is likely the best course.
     
    #16     Sep 24, 2007
  7. what do you charge susilovic?you are from swissland right? what do guys pay there?
     
    #17     Sep 24, 2007
  8. dabao91

    dabao91


    It's obvious. I voted from a CTA perspective. Your breakeven would be 25% gross return at a 0/20, a 20% gross return at 0/25 and a 15% gross return at 2/20.



    I think the breakeven point for 2/20 is about 17%.

    17 - 2 = 15

    15 * 0.2 = 3

    2 + 3 = 5
     
    #18     Sep 24, 2007
  9. www.rentec.com, but most scarce web appearance ever seen ( make yourself an impression )...In the very moment I am reading a source even citing 5% management fee and a 44% incentive fee...
     
    #19     Sep 25, 2007
  10. Industry standard 2/20, 2/25 in some cases - depending of course on performance - up to 3 / 40.
     
    #20     Sep 25, 2007