Donald Trump delivered record low black un-employment. The democrat front runner offers blacks jobs as drug dealers. Its a joke.
can you support that with any data?, or are you just parroting the Trump Admin. Is this as reliable as Mexico paying for the Wall? Obama being born in Kenya . The Ukraine ,not Russia , interfering with the 2016 election. Trump's dad being born in Germany? The record employment, I think, for blacks and whites was during the second World War.
Yeah, I guess I just made it up. I guess CNN is a pro-Trump racket now too. BTW, for two years you claimed Trump colluded with Russia. Ever get any evidence? Black unemployment rate falls to a record low https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/06/economy/black-unemployment-rate/index.html New York (CNN Business)Black unemployment fell to a record low in August, helped by a jump in the number of black women on the job. The unemployment rate for black workers fell to 5.5% from 6%, according to the Labor Department data. The previous record low of 5.9% was set in May 2018.
The Mueller Report. Mueller concluded that Russian interference was "sweeping and systematic" and "violated U.S. criminal law". Mueller indicted 26 Russian Citizens, including 11 high ranking Officers in the Russian Army, and three Russian organizations. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:...ference_In_The_2016_Presidential_Election.pdf
Mueller indicted 26 Russians, how many got convicted? Mueller has a pretty shitty record on this one. Second, I see you like moving the goal posts. The reason Mueller got involved in the first place was because the democrats claimed that Trump and Russia were working together and there was this massive conspiracy going on. The democrats and their handlers in the media did a full-court press on this who collusion narrative. Of course, even Mueller himself was not able to produce a shred of evidence. Third, Mueller is a senile old man. His Congressional testimony was an embarrassment.
You will likely not find a single claim of this sort documented anywhere, other than perhaps by a few crackpots.. The best you can do is find much speculation along these lines. Go back to grade school and learn how to read. Study vocabulary, and learn the difference between "claim" and "speculation." Mueller said had they been able to exonerate the Trump Campaign from collaborating with Russians to effect the 2016 election, they would have said so in their report!
A great deal of evidence was produced suggesting collaboration!. Mueller said that because of his employer's policy he could not indict the President, and therefore he ruled out charging the President. Nevertheless he was very clear that had he been able to exonerate the President he would have said so. It was the President himself who said the report exonerated him. This was just another of the thousands of lies Trump has told since he won the 2016 Election. And it was William Barr who first issued his personal summary of the Mueller report before the public had a chance to see even a heavily redacted version. Barr, in his summary, strongly implied that the Report exonerated the President. Nothing could have been further from the Truth.
Point to the page and line in the report that said Trump was colluding with Russia to rig the election. Point to the statement when Mueller said he would indict Trump. Explain this, when the democrats decided to make up charges against Trump and impeach, the report was so devoid of evidence against Trump that they could not even get a single charge out of it.