"We Understand The Chinese Government Has Halted Purchases Of US Treasuries": SGH

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by Error Correction Funder, Apr 9, 2018.

  1. JackRab

    JackRab

    Yep... but I don't see how that would mean the SP500 would tank to 2500.... if the tarrifs are off and a good deal with China... we'll see 3000
     
    #31     Apr 9, 2018
  2. destriero

    destriero

    Yeah lets disregard the Constitutional crisis. Trump having a 9-minute briefing about Syria in which he devoted 8.5 minutes to conflating Mueller with the FBI Cohen sting.
     
    #32     Apr 9, 2018
  3. sss12

    sss12

    @zdreg....please read jackrab's post. A couple of times.
     
    #33     Apr 9, 2018
  4. DeltaRisk

    DeltaRisk

    Yay, *clap clap*

    I just didn’t want to waste the time explaining to someone who doesn’t want to read. It’s simple, thank you for redirecting.

    @sss12
     
    #34     Apr 10, 2018
    sss12 likes this.
  5. WeToddDid2

    WeToddDid2

    I think that you missed my point.
     
    #35     Apr 10, 2018
  6. eurusdzn

    eurusdzn

    That was a quick deal.
    No choice for me but to buy a market break out of this consolidation area top. No telling that this cant drift for weeks(s)...or not
     
    #36     Apr 10, 2018
  7. JackRab

    JackRab

    Maybe he wasn't around during the GFC ;)
     
    #37     Apr 10, 2018
  8. maxpi

    maxpi

    Crisis? I'm a little lost here. Do you mean the one where "equality" is redefined to mean income equality? Militia is redefined to mean "the government"? Free speech is redefined to mean marxist speech? Confiscation of property without a trial? Income taxation? What?
     
    #38     Apr 11, 2018
  9. destriero

    destriero


    It's was clearly qualified with, "Constitution"

    Your comments require the following:

    A. Trump tells Cabinet to "CONFISCATE NOW and worry about Due Process later!"

    B. Vet in Florida first to suffer confiscation under Florida GOP law post-Parkland.

    Link: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/04/1...ads-to-first-seizure-army-veterans-ar-15.html

    #RickScott
     
    #39     Apr 11, 2018
  10. Sig

    Sig

    I'm confused, you support allowing someone charged with attempted murder by firearms to continue to own firearms..if they're a veteran of course..or you're pointing out the sheer lunacy of implying that's some kind of government overreach?
     
    #40     Apr 11, 2018