Almost agree. You are improving, keep it up. I would say even it’s not 100% perfect we have no time to wait. Use it or lose it.
I think rubbish data is possibly worse than no data, we could be talking 20% perfect, which is far from perfect. A lot of the lockdowns and fear is from bad data from China, look where that got us, world wide depression, over a end of the year 0.1% increase is deaths.
Professor front line in the UK, so all staff I'd assume exposed a lot so expected 100% or very near, only 7% tested positive, or he could of been checking back office staff.
Absolutely right. If you red some of my statements I stated all border should be closed. However, Trump did not do that and European did not as well. Lost two months to prepare.
Raises questions over Southalls, 22% NYC have antibodies, same test ?? Could be much higher, but are we that lucky in 2020 ??
Closing borders, has a HUGE cost. Unless you shut down everyone in / out of china for 2 - 5years so there are zero infected and carrying ( for ever if reinfecting possible ), it would always go wild sooner or later.
I do not know about tests UK got. Yes I know if somebody got sick with light symptoms may not have antibodies. Last week Cuomo stated this test 3000 cases shown 13% exposed. As statistic researcher you may add % of were sick but no antibodies and you will have the valid number. The point we should go over the hill.
Well, if we close we will buy the time, swing it to summer, see how you UK handle it. But government at local, state, fed always find the worse solution.