Which is fine and all. But it has been reported that the exclusive deal that was held between Citi and WB was pretty ironclad. So if that was the case 1) TOO BAD FOR WB they should have waited and NOT have signed anything, THE LAW IS THE LAW. 2)If there was this deal signed between WB and Citi saying WB could deal with noone else. WHAT WAS WB'S CEO STEELE THINKING, when he signed a deal with Wells Fargo!??!!?? Morons running the system, any wonder it's collapsing?
Haha! A appeals court judge threw out the order from the first judge. Wells Fargo for the win... Poor Citi, can't pay $2bln to add more toxic debt to the balance sheet... http://www.businessweek.com/ap/fina...op+news_top+news+index+-+temp_news+++analysis