For Tsing Tao You're a full-fledged professor at ET with 20k posts, Maxpi above is likely an Associate Professor with 7k posts, I'm a bum with zip but trying to catch up to you, but you oughtta read his first line, its gives you the entire basis for this thread. "I guess we're in the part of the cycle of civilization where men get sidelined. Women and children are in charge leading up to collapses" ------------------ here's something Tsing Tao you might never have observed so open thine eyes from now on, the unmistakable signs are everywhere ............ The Man is lucky if he gets even 5 square feet in the house that he can call his own space - most often he is relegated to the basement and even then is harassed when his buddies come over to watch a game and drink beer. The wife and kids have taken over the entire living space and everything in the house reflects them, a feminine environment, not you or male. Apply the same to the entire USA. The country has gone feminine, all its values now are the values of women. Open your eyes, Tsing Tao, learn, learn, learn before its too late Joe
Just for the record, and I know nobody gives a damn, I belong to no groups. This is the 2nd guy that's assumed I'm a follower or member of MGTOW. Heard of MGTOW just a few days ago. But now that I know 'em, I love 'em and support them. Its akin to finding another TREND player - kindred spirit Alpha male stateside has no defense against a bitch attack, you can't hit 'em so what to do when you run into one?
[ I've found the forum rather amateurish. I love the forum layout and whatever script is running it, but the content is far from being a goldmine of information. I frequent the stock section and that's obviously what all the noobs get started with, but have found myself in other sections and can't say I'm impressed. QUOTE="Here4money, post: 4490180, member: 496573"][/QUOTE] Hahahahaha, Jennifer, with a name like "here4money" you will not be successful in this gold digger thread. And (see your post above at your photo) why are you here if you don't like ET?
I have come to realize... this a quote applies to so much more than just trading. Win or lose, everybody gets what they want out of the market. Some people seem to to lose, so they win by losing” – Ed Seykota.
Here's your homework, Jem. Gather up all your 500 trading/investing books, re-read 'em all, but this time note only the truly important stuff (with the benefit of hindsight). Then be a nice fella and send me a copy of the single page you've filtered out. The 500 books can then be drop-kicked into the trash or given to Goodwill. You will grow 6" taller just by this drop-kick. Side benefit: Ed Seykota's cliches will not be on that page.
My fav professor once told me, when you come face to face with a towering problem that has you whipped repeatedly, instead of asking for help like a cry-baby, do the following Using just what you already know, drop down to basic-basic, then start from there and derive forward. Jesus did exactly that and the problem vanished instantly
I already read the books and took profitable ideas. one author gary smith was here for a while (the one who wrote about living the dream)I told him I made six figures off idea he spoke about in his book. I also made six figures for a year or two front running buy or sell programs -- off an idea that was inspired when reading an options book. It required a great data feed... but it was awesome for a few years. I made at least a grand for 90 straight days with it. I should have been trading 10000 shares at a time instead of 1000 at the time. So it was not hindsight... I did it real time for profit back when I was trading full time. And then my method (not the program related one) which was an augmentation of a method taught to me was sold and hyped on trading markets for years... by my former business partner. Having also trained and back day traders back in the 90s I watched ed seykota's ideas play out over an over. If you don't understand what Ed Seykota was saying... its your loss.
I will say that was the one of the rare times I saw a guest out debate 3 fox news hosts including tucker carlson. but... in a way she just limited the argument to one that is pretty clear. When should removed the kids and the emotions and pretty much the moral argument and just stuck with the legal system... there was not much of an argument left.
Yes, we know. All my attacks are feminine and come from the feminist psychology book. Do you have any other retort whatsoever?