Come next November you'll support the democratic candidate regardless of who it is. You will do so for the very same reason I will support the republican candidate regardless of who it is. We, the entire electorate are being forced to choose between the extremes. Both party candidates will pander to those extremes and the extremist views will dominate the conversation which will be mostly propelled by the media which is only to willing to watch this country burn to the ground for better ratings. At the end of the day we must decide which extreme presents a greater threat to our society. While neither of us, or the majority of Americans may support these extremes, that's the choice we're making. I see the extremist views of the far left far more threatening than those of the extreme right. While you bring up trading as some distraction from the topic I will say that any good trader can readily see that the trend is down for America in general, and has been for many years, decades really. The Trump presidency is not a reversal of that trend, it is a pullback. A reversal would require far greater changes than Trump will ever bring to bear.
Uh you don't know who I will vote for to be honest. I have never voted for a party regardless of who it is, that is how spineless sheeple vote. If you have two choices and you vote for the lesser of two evils or to support your party in Congress is one thing, but voting blind is just allegiance to a party and of small mind and country comes before party.
True, I make that assessment based on the overall content you post, which admittedly is a poor tool to use to make such a judgment. I do however believe that you and I, along with the overwhelming majority of Americas would love to see someone, anyone from an opposing party take on the extremists in their own party. I would love to see any of the democratic candidates square up against the open borders crowd and tell them that just isn't reality and we cannot have a rational discussion about border security if that is your position. I'd be elated to hear one, just one of the democratic candidates explain in detail how this free college is going to work. What exactly is the leftist definition of free? Shifting the burden of payment isn't free. If the argument is going to be that we the taxpayers are "investing" in the future generations, then as an investor/shareholder we should have say in what these institutions teach and what they charge for said teachings. I want to hear that discussion in detail. Change my mind about your party is my challenge to democratic candidates. The burden is on them, not me, not you, not any of us in the general population. If their only argument is orange man bad, Russia, Russia, Russia, then I will remain steadfast in believing that the democratic party is being run by lunatics.
The extreme liberals in the Democrat Party has been crazy for a long, long time! How else can you explain to me any politician elected by Americans and US citizens, can now just say, I have my loyalties to illegals only and they get priority over actual US citizens! Can any politician in China or Japan or Korea take that stance and not get skinned alive or tried for treason in their own countries and shot by firing squad? Yet, in California, they passed a bill which will be signed into law giving illegals free healthcare. On top of that, American citizens who cannot afford to pay for their healthcare will be required to pay a tax because of not having any healthcare? That my friends, is outright treason! If they did that in China, favor foreigners over Chinese citizens, that politician would be tried for treason, found guilty. Then, executed by firing squad!
That post was not meant for you, just because I replied to you does not mean I was talking to you. jeez....
And if we were to follow your behavior (and by "your", I mean you personally) we'd take this post seriously and make you (and by "you", I mean you personally) explain you're (and by "you're", I mean you personally) being sarcastic. If we all force each other to clarify what is quite obvious in our text it is going to be even more cumbersome than it currently is to talk about anything around here.
My English is just fine, CO just has a tendency to walk back his whackjob statements when questioned critically is all.
There is nothing in that post which specifically targets any single person. Anyone with a 7th grade level reading comprehension would know that. All subsequent posts were adding context to the original generalization. When faced with indisputable facts you lefties do what you do best, go full obtuse. Business as usual.