Well, it is a dilemma isn't it. Even the minorities could not get traction among the minorities and the women could not get much traction among the women. So there were another 27 stupid candidates who should not have been allowed to run. Booty, Beto, on and on. You think, for example, that Bootyboy did not know that he was not going to win in SC the day he entered the race? And then there is also the argument- not without merit- that candidates such as Joe Biden who are also "this stupid" or worse should not be allowed to run because it "causes losses in elections." The dems needed to find a quality candidate. They didn't. It's going to be a process of putting bondo and duct tape on Biden every step of the way.
These clowns cite factors that allegedly hurt them, and there are instances where it does but they never discuss the net gain or loss. Hillary and Warren got more votes because they were women - not fewer. It was their major calling card. Same with Kamala flopping out the race card after she stepped down. She didnt get much interest or many votes but what little she did got more votes for being a woman and semi-black rather than less. Suppose Kamala showed up with her same "charisma" but was white and male. You think more people would have taken an interest in her? Ahh, no.
Don't worry, Joe will make an epic bad choice for his VP. Applicants must possess dark skin and a vagina. Others need not apply.
Maybe you can find a chart and super-impose the swine-flu. I'd be willing to bet, djt is exponentially ahead. Hell he closed the arrivals in about 3 weeks. Too bad he wasn't in office for Katrina.... things would have turned out much different if this Corona thing is any metric.Graduate level maga on his part. Not even a sniffle here. BTW.... the Dow tanked today. 3M up another 1.5%. Go figure.
Or maybe you can answer the question that was asked.You criticized Obama for only stock piling 30 million,how many has Trump stock-piled?
Maybe yall forgot the last 2 democrat nominees were black and female,when was the last time conservatives did that? Who has the most minorities in Congress? Democrats or Republicans?
Duuuuh. Its his first go at this pandemic thing. I can bet by the time he leaves office, it'll be a hell of a lot more than Obama's 30M. Come on Tony. How ignorant is that? And that's after a 1000 plus Americans died of swine flu. On his watch. He didn't take note?!!! Christ, only 986 Louisiana residents died in Katrina https://www.datacenterresearch.org/data-resources/katrina/facts-for-impact/ I'm sure you can find a few higher counts... but I can remember people terrified to the point of not living their lives because of Swine Flu. It took over 6 months to declare an emergency. Michelle was on vacation as I recall. I think you should give a reach-around maga... at least... to djt. So far its petering out in N. America if you look at the China statistics... which I'm sure were waaaaay under-reported. (Next post... "Tony Starck".... In Puerto Rico the count was....)
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-cut-cdcs-budget-democrats-claim-analysis/story?id=69233170 The president introduced his fiscal year 2021 budget proposal on Feb. 10, just 11 days after the World Health Organization declared the coronavirus outbreak a public health emergency of international concerns. The spending plan included a 16 percent reduction in CDC funding from the 2020 spending levels. In fact, all of Trump’s budget proposals have called for cuts to CDC funding, but Congress has intervened each time by passing spending bills with year-over-year increases for the CDC that Trump then signed into law.
https://fortune.com/2020/02/26/coronavirus-covid-19-cdc-budget-cuts-us-trump/ Trump administration budget cuts could become a major problem as coronavirus spreads By Chris Morris February 26, 2020 11:45 AM EST The Trump administration recently requested $2.5 billion in emergency funds to prepare the U.S. for a possible widespread outbreak of coronavirus. Critics, though, are pointing out that money might not be necessary if the administration hadn’t spent the past two years largely dismantling government units that were designed to protect against pandemics. The cuts started in 2018, as the White House focused on eliminating funding to Obama-era disease security programs. In March of that year, Rear Adm. Timothy Ziemer, whose job it was to lead the U.S. response in the event of a pandemic, abruptly left the administration and his global health security team was disbanded. That same year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was forced to slash its efforts to prevent global disease outbreak by 80% as its funding for the program began to run out. The agency, at the time, opted to focus on 10 priority countries and scale back in others, including China. Also cut was the Complex Crises Fund, a $30 million emergency response pool that was at the secretary of state’s disposal to deploy disease experts and others in the event of a crisis. (The fund was created by former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.) Overall in 2018, Trump called for $15 billion in reduced health spending that had previously been approved, as he looked at increasing budget deficits, cutting the global disease-fighting budgets of the CDC, National Security Council (NSC), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and Health and Human Services (HHS) in the process. The effects of those cuts are being felt today. While the CDC announced plans to test people with flu-like symptoms for COVID-19, those have been delayed and only three of the country’s 100 public-health labs have been able to test for coronavirus. The administration’s request for additional funding came roughly two weeks after officials said HHS was almost out of funding for its response to the virus. The cuts could be especially problematic as COVID-19 continues to spread. Health officials are now warning the U.S. is unlikely to be spared, even though cases are minimal here so far. "It's not so much of a question of if this will happen in this country any more but a question of when this will happen and how many people in this country will have severe illness," Dr. Nancy Messonnier, the director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, said during a press call Tuesday.