Well, I just gave you an example of you can manipulate your success on collective 2. Now you also want an example of a trading system that can make profits for a long time and then be wiped out by one trade? Those are numerous. For example just doubling down after each 1% move down would be an example.
This one is not going to get any subscribers. Investors are not fools who easily part with their money.
I am trying to refute your point that it's easy to manipulate collective2 systems to get the subscribers. What I am asking you is to give me example of such a technique of rewarding manipulation that will prove your point.
Hi Tandh: There are a few profitable trading systems on Collective2, you can go to the "grid" and select the type of financial instrument you want to trade (Stocks, Forex, Futures, Options or All), the minimum "age" of the system in days (for example more than 365, > 365), the minimum number of trades, the profit factor (for example more than 2, > 2 ), the Sharpe ratio, the maximum drawdown, etc...and then press Enter and you will get a listing of all the systems that correspond to your parameters. There are currently 728 active systems: http://collective2.com/cgi-perl/system/grid.mpl
the solution: consistent risk management and at least 3x risk and your scenario will be less of a probability.
True. False. You can risk $1 to make millions and still end up losing a truckload of money in the long run. Play the lotto if you are not convinced. On the other hand you can risk $100 to make $50 and still make money in the long run. You risk/reward ratio is not a guarantee of profitability, far from it. And yet, most traders naively believe that a 3 to 1 risk/reward ratio is the key to making money consistently.
i generally go by a minimum of 3:7 ratio. btw anyone know if i can trade spreads on C2? if yes then how?
all depends on the quality of the entry and risk parameters and other variables that are beyond the scope of this thread.