I just posted an article in the Sweden thread where they mention this issue in the UK, with similar to better results reached in Sweden without lockdown. It seems lockdowns helped most/at all when they were impkemented early, which was not the case ib the UK. And of course you still have the issue of what will happen when those early lockdowns are lifted. We might see soon, as a lot of easing is starting inbthe Western world.
North East is much higher. A drive through testing facility in Chicago area suburbs reported 30 to 50 percent of all tested already had the covid19 antibody.....
Google didnt give me any results. Do you have a Link? Only thing i could find was: "At a hospital in Chicago, a non-randomized sample found that 30-50% of patients tested for COVID-19 have antibodies in their system, suggesting they already had the virus and have potential immunity."
They will try to claim that. Eccks, military checkpoints, where are you ?? If it made sense and wasn't such a huge over reaction then it would be fine, but it doesn't and it is, got Sweden for proof of that. The Damage done and lives lost by the measures is huge.
30-50 vague, but nice numbers. That State is only only on 35K tested and 1.5K dead. Nice even at 30%.
Yes, UK hit critical mass ie no stopping it, merely slowing it a tad by the time of the lockdown, hopefully they did to keep the snowflakes happy pushed it back enough still on Herd really but with pointless lockdowns. As no hospital over filled, no lives wasted needlessly, just the 1's it was going to kill. ( ignoring the lives Lockdown and FEAR have cost ofcourse ) All of the too early / strict 1's will kill it, till it comes back, which it will. Great to Kill if Vaccine / Treatment available later on mind.
Ignore all the evidence. UK began locked down on March 23. Two weeks later deaths and new cases peaked. Lockdowns worked. Saved many lives. Whether the economic costs were worth it is another matter. But lives were saved thats for sure. You only have to look at Sweden, they dont think the economic cost is worth it, they may be right. But sweden has much more deaths than Norway + Denmark + Finland combined.
Ahhh but... 14days for someone to start getting sick. 21days before they require hospital. So 1 week before the lockdowns would of kicked in, the peak was reached. No hospital shortages at all, therefore everyone that's died would of died. So ZERO Lives saved. 10,000 lives lost according to the Stat's over the lockdowns due to people not willing to go to hospital for life saving treatment. So saved = ZERO, lost = -10,000 = Cluster FUCK!! And Norway + Denmark + Finland, will suffer lockdowns for years, till eventually they are forced to give up, there there deaths will be the same, just later. LOGIC!!
See too soon, hospital 21 days, deader 24 days min. No change in the chart on bbc site yesterday which was hospital admissions around when the lockdown would of started effect, reason being every house hold pretty much had it so its just spreading to other house members.