This recording was part of tradingschools.org's review of Viper Trading Systems as an attempt to illustrate a lack of value in their trading room.
I should opine and inform to others not aware, that Emmett of tradingschools does not give bad reviews due to not receiving a vig deal nor does he "extort". Yes, he does make mistakes from time to time. Often times, a bad or lackluster review rating results from the vendor refusing to show proof they actually even trade along with extra exposed shenanigans. But for the most part he has exposed a big chunk of the scummery of the fraudulent trading vendor industry so far. And as a result has saved a lot of newbies each month who are fortunate to have come across the site and read the reviews before they get caught up with dubious trading rooms and products costing up to tens of thousands and wasting a lot of extra time. Tradingschools' main revenue comes from the google ads as a blog. Emmett isn't trying to make a fortune with the site, and he probably can't. As a former felon, he's trying to make some good and expose the rot of the retail vendor industry which can help and alert some newbs. The CFTC and the FBI work with him and the site in investigating and eventually indicting some of the more harmful and egregious fraud vendors, and tradingschools is the only review site standing up to these frauds and their hired legal threats.
Did you see Dean Handley's review of him? What do you think? We can safely say that most of educators are fraudsters, so if I review them all/most negatively, I am going to be right most of the time. If he would instead only provide positive reviews, then his success rate would be much lower. So he has nothing to lose by publishing bad reviews because he can always back pedal later and change his mind. Can't trust anyone online.
Oh, Handley is pretty much a joke now. His long running double-talk and vig behind the scenes was thoroughly exposed. Handley's review of Emmett was just a desperate reaction to attempt to marginalize tradingschools' effectiveness where he omits a lot of positive details. It's quite amusing to see that Handley didn't really do in depth review videos until tradingschools took over the most respect and trustworthiness of the vendor review niche. And his "titans" one after another keep getting exposed or charged by the CFTC recently. yes, the rot is overwhelmingly pervasive of the so called retail educator/vendor industry. Once a retailer has traded live for a long time and been around the block, it's much easier to tell how they're all sim shows and have long since stopped live trading. And we know most successful real traders wouldn't bother with an education business where they would be doing a fund, quietly trading for themselves for a living, or working on wall st. already. Emmett does have a vetting process. And he gets a lot of flak in his personal life for sticking to negative reviews that deserve it. So no, I don't believe he's just doing negative reviews by default just to work some "success" rate. And a big difference between him and Handley is that Handley has multiple shilled and fake yt accounts posting on his yt videos where it's laughably so apparent and repeated in video after video. Where in Emmett's "good" reviews, commentary is unmoderated and anyone is free to say they disagree anytime or still think the vendor is fraudulent or not even a good trader.
Wow, this just says it all about trading rooms. I am still figuring out this "Handley" vs. "Emmett" confrontatation....and the fake YouTube accounts. This is getting complex. Who can we trust as a independent third party reviewer of trading rooms and their performance ?
I was just in Viper Trading room for a 7 day trial and this posted video () on that room was spot on. Viper is really sleazy and a big scam. Are there any other reviews around?
Take the trial and see and watch for yourself. Thats the only way to find out for yourself. tradingschools and futures io have their own agenda.