lol... batshitgirl, you're just as incompetent as ever, I see. Your little hissy fit/holiday, during which you were apparently 'proving your point', didn't seem to help you in that sense. By the way... what exactly was the 'point' that you say you 'proved' by throwing a hissy fit and claiming that you were leaving forever and then slinking back a few weeks later like a 7 year old who has just thrown a tantrum but been ignored by the parents?
The U.S. National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) Final Reports of the Federal Building and Fire Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster (Oct. 2005) as well as the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), World Trade Center Building Performance Study (FEMA 403 / May 2002) found that fire/damage-caused the collapse of the World Trade Center. Popular Mechanics, magazine supported the conclusions reached by NIST and FEMA and sharply criticized the critics. 9/11: Debunking The Myths (March 2005). Scientific American, magazine also supported conclusions reached by NIST and FEMA. When the Twin Towers Fell (October 2001). So everyone has some idea what a plane is capable of what they believe it can or cannot do. What is and is not possible. Everything is well documented. JC
Moreover, a massive compilation of recorded evidence that a controlled demolition brought down the WTC, not simply a gasoline-based fire caused by the Airliners used as suicide missiles, is shown by the Powerhouse Collection of 9-11 Controlled Demolition Quotes, compiled by the Revere Radio Network (Nov 9, 2005). One auxiliary building that was not touched by those missiles was nevertheless leveled in the explosion, as explained to FINS in a phone interview with Donald Meserlian, chairman of Voices of Safety, a safety standards development firm. Other reports, e.g., private engineering investigations; the 9-11 Review; 9-11 Research; 9-11 Proof, and The Sept. 11 Records, published by The New York Times (Aug 12, 2005), including more than 12,000 pages of oral histories rendered in the voices of 503 firefighters, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians, also bring into question the theory that the collapse of the towers was caused by a gasoline-based fire. An editorial written by Bill Manning, editor in chief of Fire Engineering magazine (Jan 2002), the 125-year old journal of record among Americaâs fire engineers and firefighters, has blasted the investigation conducted by FEMA of the collapsed World Trade Center as a âa half-baked farce.â ("The structural damage from the planes and the explosive ignition of jet fuel in themselves were not enough to bring down the towers.") This evidence was corroborated by a statement broadcast on PBS in which Larry A. Silverstein, President of Silverstein Properties, the firm that controls the World Trade Center, stated that upon his own order WTC7 was deliberately demolished by controlled demolition. Twin Towers were built with a sequenced internal explosion system. This is legally required in areas where buildings are congested in order to ensure symmetrical collapse when the building ages and is condemned and has to be demolished. Listen to this PBS interview with Larry Silverstein, owner of the WTC, describing how he had Building #7 demolished! MP3 of Silverstein "Pull It" This admission appeared in a PBS documentary originally aired in Sept. of 2002 entitled "Rebuilding America, A Year at Ground Zero". "...I remember getting a call from the fire department commander telling me they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire...and I said, 'Well, you know, we've had such terrible loss of life...maybe the smartest thing to do is, is 'pull' it...and they made that decision to 'pull'...uh, and we watched the building collapse." In the demolition industry, "pull" is the common term they use for demolishing buildings with explosives. Audio tape of remarks of Larry A. Silverstein, and related context, are posted online at 911 Inside Job. As the source document discloses Mr. Silverstein later offered a contradictory explanation for his testimony, therefore, one cannot accept his original statement as an "admission" despite its persuasive nature. Nevertheless, the compiled evidence strongly suggests that all of the WTC buildings were pre-outfitted for controlled demolition. This includes the previously mentioned recorded statements included in 9-11 Proof, and The Sept. 11 Records. Americans have been left in a muddle between the conflicting conclusions reached by NIST and FEMA, and their critics. However, critical events such as flashing lights and explosions in a typical controlled building demolition can be see and heard clearly by anyone for themselves without any outside interpretation. These dramatic and threatening sound and light shows may be readily compared with the recorded evidence of virtually identical events that occurred during the WTC disaster. That comparison provides an objective way for everyone to pierce this overriding muddle and personally evaluate one critical aspect of the true relevant facts about the 9/11 terrorist attack telling us just who the terrorists may be: insiders or outsiders? Click on this building demolition video of the J.L. Hudson Department Store located at Detroit, Michigan. The video shows what occurred when this building was pulled down. Notice the low-level flashes, the explosions, followed by the building collapse into dust from the bottom, not from where the planes hit the building. This is precisely what occurred at World Trade Center buildings according to the following recorded statements. Statement of Assistant Commissioner (F.D.N.Y.), Stephen Gregory, Bureau of Communications. October 3rd, 2001, 1540 hours: A. ... before No. 2 came down, that I saw low-level flashes. In my conversation with Lieutenant Evangelista, ... he questioned me and asked me if I saw low-level flashes in front of the building, and I agreed with him because ... I saw a flash flash flash and then it looked like the building came down. Q. Was that on the lower level of the building or up where the fire was? A. No, the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? ... He said I don't know if I'm crazy, but I just wanted to ask you because you were standing right next to me. He said did you see anything by the building? And I said what do you mean by see anything? He said did you see any flashes? I said, yes, well, I thought it was just me. He said no, I saw them, too. Statement of Firefighter (F.D.N.Y.), Edward Cachia. December 6th, 2001. The time is 2 p.m. As my officer and I were looking at the south tower, it just gave. It actually gave at a lower floor, not the floor where the plane hit, because we originally had thought there was like an internal detonation explosives because it went in succession, boom, boom, boom, boom, and then the tower came down. Statement of Captain of Emergency Medical Services, Karin Deshore, November 7, 2001, 5:49 A.M.: somewhere around the middle of the world trade center there was this orange and red flash coming out ... initially it was just one flash then this flash just kept popping all the way around the building and that building had started to explode ... and with each popping sound it was initially an orange and then red flash came out of the building and then it would just go all around the building on both sides ... as far as could see these popping sounds and the explosions were getting bigger going both up and down and then all around the building." Matthy Levy, Structural Engineer and coauthor of Why buildings Fall Down (1994), make this statement: If you've seen many of the managed demolitions where they implode a building and they cause it to essentially to fall vertically because they cause all of the vertical columns to fail simultaneously, that's exactly what it looked like and that's what happened. Dave Heller, who has degrees in physics and architecture, defends the demolition theory of what occurred at the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11, in, Taking a Closer Look: Hard Science and the Collapse of the World Trade Center, Garlic & grass (Dec 2005). http://sunsite.utk.edu/FINS/Global_Revolution/Fins-GR-01.htm So again, my question is that if in my post before this the government agencies made it's claim as to what it was. How come it differs so much from what so many others witnessed? Why make it something that it was not? Why not come out and let it be known that was exactly what they intended to do. (bring the buildings down) JC
Are you ready to admit - in the interest of seeking the truth about 9/11 - that the story you believe MAY be wrong? If so, I will tell you my ENTIRE belief about 9/11 / Bush /Afghanistan / Iraq....... Otherwise, you're just a troll on the ZZzz level of filth......
like i said, i know you changed your mind.... why this crap still??? i hope ur smarter than nikki and pornboy.
LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO batshitgirl officially becomes a member of the 'ET's Biggest Idiots" club, by responding to a logical question about a claim he made by posting a bizarre image, just as his hero ZTroll used to do until I schooled him so badly that he had to quit.
Yep, he stepped in the shit again, by telling me that he 'made his point' by throwing a hissy fit like a 6 year old kid and then when the sniffling stopped, coming back and pretending that he never left. I asked him what this 'point' was that he felt he made... His response? A bizarre image post just like the disgusting troll used to do all the time when he was backed into a corner. These internet trolls are all the same. There must be a handbook somewhere. Either that or the psychopathology just has a uniform expression. It's evidently correlated with acute paranoia as well.
WOW 5 pages of rathumper getting annihilated this must wreak havoc on his already feeble mind Haroki, the bottom line is that logic and objectivity went out the window the first time rabitch saw hiw first michael moore movie and immediately fell in love with that fat prick.