For some strange, ghoulish reason I've read the NTSB accident report of each fatal commercial airline crash in U.S. history. They're now all on line. Rat, quite a few crashes have left no discernable debris. Two in recent memory. The 1996 Value Jet crash in the Everglades and the American Eagle crash in Indiana in 1994. In each of these crashes the planes hit the ground at a tremendous rate of speed after plunging from several thousand feet. Because non-landing/takeoff crashes are RARE (i.e. Flight 800) there's not many comparative examples to choose from. But yea, if you take a fully fueled jet liner and slam it into the ground at 400mph their isn't going to be much left. Hell look at how little of AMR Flight 191 was left intact after the DC-10 crashed across the street from O'Hare in 1979. That plane never even made it beyond 500ft airborne and yet disintegrated. Here's some other photo's. http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/compare/jetcrashdebris.html Like stevegee58 say's, airliners are not cars. They're relatively lightweight machines that aren't built to withstand crashes. Of course the obvious questions remain unanswered by moonbats. If Flight 93 didn't crash in PA then where are the passengers? What motive would be served by the Government making up the story of 93. What about the dozens of phone calls made by passengers from the plane after the hijackers appeared?
One of my favorite web sites: airdisaster.com Check out the cockpit voice recorder section if you're bored one night. Particularly chilling is when you hear the audible warning system calmly saying "beep...beep...beep Stall! beep...beep...beep Stall!"
the more your ignorance is exposed the madder you seem to get. i would like to see a graph of that relationship PANCAKE BOY!!!!!!
valujet... ummmmm that was in a swamp, NO? there were some shady circumstances regarding that one if i remember correctly.
why is it that conspiracy theorists never comment on anything that would discredit their stupid conspiracy theories?? are all you guys going to simply ignore the fact that i have shown you what happens when a plane hits a concrete wall at full speed? you wouldnt find anything bigger than a grain of sand off of this plane.
Yeah, except your vid doesnt actually show that, does it? Debunks absolutely nothing, really. In much the same way as the media vid only IMPLIED there was nothing bigger than a phonebook, when they said the debris radius was how big? Even in a chopper, i doubt they could have scoured every inch of the site. Not a debris radius, aftermath, close ups of the damage etc. Concrete isnt dirt, either. That plane was at a direct straight down angle too. Plus, is was a fighter, not an airliner-in fact a far more compact and strong aircraft. There you go, some comment.
porn... we know what brain you used to come up with this lame comparison. you are comparing this to flt 93? you're stupider than harooski and his pancakes. the official version of the crash states the soil was extremely loose... to compare that with ur stupid video is beyond insanity. not even mentioning the different angles of impact. now put on ur banana hammock and go to work.
What I find interesting is the exchange of ownership 6 months prior or leading up to Sept. 11, 2001. I remember seeing on a late night show, where the new owner was interviewed for purchasing the buildings, another fact how he was not even there that day. Travelers Insurance was the insurance company on the two buildings which was valued at over 7 billion dollars. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=Travelers+Dispute+Twin+Towers http://www.insurancejournal.com/magazines/southcentral/2002/09/02/features/23196.htm "Larry Silverstein is the New York property tycoon who purchased the entire WTC complex just 6 months prior to the 9/11 attacks. That was the first time in its 33-year history the complex had EVER changed ownership. " http://fourwinds10.com/NewsServer/ArticleFunctions/ArticleDetails.php?ArticleID=10744 There is more to the story, then many give thought too. All I do know is alot about that day doesnt seem or feel right. God Bless you all, and may the truth be surfaced. Sincerely JC
Yes... just like water is 'extremely loose'. if you hit the water from a 25,000' free fall, it's nothing like hitting a hard surface. Stick to the basics of CT, ratgirl. Every time you attempt to make anything resembling a statement of materials science, you step in a pile of shit. And btw, buddy... welcome back. I knew you'd be just like every one else who says 'Boo-hoo, I'm mad and I'm leaving and I'm not coming back'. Difficult to believe that you could actually do something so childish as to threaten to leave and then come back. You obviously don't have children, because if you did, you would know that this is a kid's technique and you wouldn't have done it.
A lawsuit in which claims the buildings were brought down by demolition. Sept. 11th had dealings that were not entirely truthful. Why the coverup? http://www.911forthetruth.com/pdfs/Rodriguezvs.Bush .pdf challenge everything. Truth lives, find it. Sincerely, JC