Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

Discussion in 'Politics' started by jem, Mar 3, 2013.

  1. stu can't be honest so it's really just an insult fest.
    I could rip him to shreds but so far I haven't decided to waste the time.

    So what does the communist moron(that would be you ricter since marx was your avatar) have to say about the existence of God?
     
    #141     Mar 15, 2013
  2. stu

    stu

    LOL.:D You wish.
     
    #142     Mar 15, 2013
  3. stu

    stu

    ...with a piano key that can and will create itself from nothing.... it's not necessary to summon any fine tuners, dancing or otherwise .
     
    #143     Mar 15, 2013
  4. Ricter

    Ricter

    Lol.

    But... how come fine-tuners can't create themselves from nothing, too? : )
     
    #144     Mar 15, 2013
  5. stu

    stu

    Because Ricter I'd say, it's really all too clear how imaginary abstract make-believe concepts like fine tuners, unnecessary to a piano key, need a piano key to create themselves in.
     
    #145     Mar 15, 2013
  6. Ricter

    Ricter

    Hmm, I see. So is this the origin of "string" theory?
     
    #146     Mar 15, 2013
  7. jem

    jem

    very nice ricter.

    an illusion

    the conjectured 5th through 10th compactified unproven strings which create almost universes.
     
    #147     Mar 15, 2013
  8. jem

    jem

    what complete utter horseshit.
    you have become an embarrassment to your greifer troll friends.
    you have run out of brain power and now you resort to lies and fake straw men.


    1. No one has ever stated physicists prove God's existence.

    You have turned into a complete liar.

    2. I just proved to you Hawkings statement is conditioned on the multiverse.

    If it were not, you still have the fine tuning problem.

    (not to mention I have given you the quotes from this paper dozens of times.)

    3. What juvenile shit to propose. Is this some new jury instruction.

    Speculator in uno, Speculator in omnibus.

    Scientists are allowed to speculate.
    Its frauds like you pretend Hawkings speculations are fact which is the problem on this thread.





     
    #148     Mar 15, 2013
  9. jem

    jem

    until you present something with substance.
    This is going to be my response.

     
    #149     Mar 15, 2013
  10. stu

    stu

    "Physicists Prove God Existence"
    1. It is stated in the title of the vid you puked up time after time.

    You really don't even read, let alone understand what you post.

    No you didn't. You have proved you delude yourself into believing you have . Different thing altogether.
    Your own link states...."without invoking the existence of the Multiverse."
    READ YOUR OWN LINKS you idiot.

    You say they are speculating.
    You can't have him or Susskind or any other of the scientists you try drag in as an authority in ANY way, other than one that is speculating.
    They don't support your claim for or against your "Tuner" because, you have stated, they are only speculating.
    That's a non-argument you have there.

    You're really not up to this. You can't even understand the basic fundamental flaming obvious when it's in your face.
     
    #150     Mar 15, 2013