Video| Fine Tuning from the Top Scientists

This is the reality of today's science.
I claim what Susskind explains.

Now Stu lets see you debunk the the co founder of string theory on science.

Don't go bullshitting and setting up straw men about what I claim. I claim what Susskind explains here in the video.

It is getting hard to determine where your delusions begin, Stu.

So for you sake. Stick to real quotes and reality.
If you make a claim about what susskind says show yourself and show us it is real with a link to the full quote in context.

Now debunk Susskind. lets see it.
And once again, I claim what Susskind claims here in this video.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/2cT4zZIHR3s" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

Do you ever get tired of proving you're a retard or a plant from the Propaganda arm of the KKK.

Myself , Jem & you make a minimum of 3 people reading the thread so :How is that "another conservative bubble ... popped"
MORON?

 

1) I happen to believe in the political ideal of our founding father's freedom and libertarianism, that it somehow offends you is telling.

2) I think people know that "you" are the fool in this exchange.

3a) Will I die not giving a fuck if stu becomes/is a believer or not in God, you betcha.
3b) Will I die being a believer in the existence of god: yeah probably so.
What's it to you?

 

Here are a few ways to help you get a grip.

You claimed Susskind/string theory/ "the reality of today's science" is pure speculation.
Your authority according to you, is speculating.
You've categorized as speculation what your authority says .
You've invalidated your appeal to authority.
You've made an appeal to authority fallacy.
You've even posted the description of your own appeal to authority fallacy.

Honestly, you couldn't make your shit up.



Ohh and I see someone is still giving a fuck about not giving a fuck.


Godbothers obviously need to always stay totally irrational and self-contradictory. It must come with the territory.

 

There is nothing wrong with scientific speculation.

I agree with what Susskind says because he is not conflating speculation with fact in this video at all.

I say what Susskind explains. That is what I have been saying for years.

Stu sets up strawmen. a trolls out bullshit.

 

Susskind explains string theory. So you agree with / claim string theory too now?
You say there is nothing wrong with scientific speculation.
The reason you post the same vid a thousand times is ...because you were actually trying to say you agree with a theoretical physicist's explanation of string theory.

You agree with an explanation that doesn't need god as an explanation.

Well good for you. You could have just said so.

 

As this falls into your definition of scientific speculation, you'll agree now will you, there is nothing wrong with it .

• "Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist. It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going." Stephen Hawking

 

That's circular reasoning at best.
Of course it's not necessary to invoke God, where God already exists.

 

That's not reasoning at all.
Of course it's not necessary to invoke god, where the universe can and will create itself .