This is a well written piece. Blue emphasis mine. Fauci should clearly be in jail. It is also absolutely clear that it is possible that Fauci and the NIH funded research in Wuhan that produced the covid-19 virus. https://technofog.substack.com/p/public-health-propaganda "Public Health" Propaganda Let me tell you about an under-the-table immunity deal: Dr. Fauci lied to Congress about US funding of gain of function research at Wuhan to protect US institutions. And to show their appreciation, the institutions will protect Dr. Fauci by declining to prosecute his lies. The Intercept Reporting. Revelations from The Intercept’s FOIA requests, which the US government took a year to release to the public (and only after litigation was pursued), show federal funds were used “to fund bat coronavirus research at the Chinese laboratory.” The Intercept continues: The documents show the goal of the project, led by EcoHealth Alliance, was to “understand what factors increase the risk of the next CoV [coronavirus] emerging in people.” This included modifications to the coronaviruses collected by EcoHealth Alliance. As stated in the project summary: Enter Dr. Fauci If EcoHealth Alliance sounds familiar, it is because its president, Peter Daszak, led the effort to mislead the public about the origins of COVID-19 and the likelihood it leaked from the lab. It was Daszak who organized and signed an influential “scientific” statement in The Lancet disregarding the lab leak theory – while concealing his role in the research “and creating the impression of scientific unanimity.” It was also Daszak who worked in conjunction with the US Government – in particular, Dr. Fauci – to push the false narrative that COVID couldn’t have been leaked from a lab. In April 2020, Dr. Fauci was congratulated by Daszak for helping “dispel the myths being spun around the virus’ origins.” Remarkably, this came after Dr. Fauci was warned that COVID-19 had “unusual features” that “look engineered.” It also came after Dr. Fauci had been informed gain of function research had been approved by NIH. After the article from The Intercept published, Dr. Fauci has been (again) under fire for lying to Senator Rand Paul about the US government’s funding of gain of function research at Wuhan. Of course, Dr. Fauci wasn’t the only public official lying to the public. Dr. Francis Collins, the director of the NIH, was asked point-blank by radio host Hugh Hewitt about this funding. Here is what Dr. Collins said: Understanding what this is. Properly understood, the two most powerful public health officials in the United States – Dr. Collins and Dr. Fauci – are running an intelligence operation against the American people. Assisting in the operation is the Biden Department of Justice, who apparently refuses to prosecute Dr. Fauci for his false statements to Senator Paul. Also providing help are those within the government who have been obstructing public and media FOIA requests into the funding of gain of function research. We observe, however, that their deceit, while effective, are also self-defeating, undermining their position that COVID-19 was of natural origins. You see, to an astute observer, the lies by Dr. Collins and Dr. Fauci are circumstantial evidence of guilt. The depth of that guilt is yet to be fully understood.
Hey commie scum like GWB who was defending fauci and his traitor friends.... your team of traitors forgot to mention they pathognenicity of a lab created corona virus. Ebright later posted an eight-part thread on Twitter explaining in greater detail the document’s revelations concerning the “enhanced pathogenicity” of one of the “novel, laboratory-generated SARS-related coronaviruses” created by the Wuhan lab. He noted that this particular Wuhan lab-generated SARS-related coronavirus had not been “previously disclosed publicly” and that it was found to be “more pathogenic” to humans than “the starting virus from which it was constructed.” Ebright’s Twitter thread reads: The materials show that the 2014 and 2019 NIH grants to EcoHealth with subcontracts to WIV funded gain-of-function research as defined in federal policies in effect in 2014-2017 and potential pandemic pathogen enhancement as defined in federal policies in effect in 2017-present. (This had been evident previously from published research papers that credited the 2014 grant and from the publicly available summary of the 2019 grant. But this now can be stated definitively from progress reports of the 2014 grant and the full proposal of the 2017 grant.) The materials confirm the grants supported the construction–in Wuhan–of novel chimeric SARS-related coronaviruses that combined a spike gene from one coronavirus with genetic information from another coronavirus, and confirmed the resulting viruses could infect human cells. The materials reveal that the resulting novel, laboratory-generated SARS-related coronaviruses also could infect mice engineered to display human receptors on cells (“humanized mice”). The materials further reveal for the first time that one of the resulting novel, laboratory-generated SARS-related coronaviruses–one not been previously disclosed publicly–was more pathogenic to humanized mice than the starting virus from which it was constructed… …and thus not only was reasonably anticipated to exhibit enhanced pathogenicity, but, indeed, was *demonstrated* to exhibit enhanced pathogenicity. The materials further reveal that the the grants also supported the construction–in Wuhan–of novel chimeric MERS-related coronaviruses that combined spike genes from one MERS-related coronavirus with genetic information from another MERS-related coronavirus. https://www.breitbart.com/health/20...virus-with-enhanced-pathogenicity-for-humans/
in case some moron wants to obfuscate by saying lol breitbart... here is the source from twitter. Richard H. Ebright @R_H_Ebright · Sep 6 "NEWLY RELEASED documents provide details of US-funded research on..coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology..The Intercept has obtained more than 900 pages of documents detailing..work of..EcoHealth Alliance..at the Chinese lab.." New Details Emerge About Coronavirus Research at Chinese Lab More than 900 pages of materials related to US.-funded coronavirus research in China were released following a FOIA lawsuit by The Intercept. theintercept.com 1.7K 26.4K 39.8K Richard H. Ebright @R_H_Ebright · Sep 6 "The trove of documents includes two previously unpublished grant proposals that were funded by the NIAID, as well as project updates relating to the EcoHealth Alliance’s research, which has been scrutinized amid increased interest in the origins of the pandemic." 49 1.7K 6.6K Richard H. Ebright @R_H_Ebright · Sep 6 The materials show that the 2014 and 2019 NIH grants to EcoHealth with subcontracts to WIV funded gain-of-function research as defined in federal policies in effect in 2014-2017 and potential pandemic pathogen enhancement as defined in federal policies in effect in 2017-present. 100 2.1K 6.7K Richard H. Ebright @R_H_Ebright · Sep 6 (This had been evident previously from published research papers that credited the 2014 grant and from the publicly available summary of the 2019 grant. But this now can be stated definitively from progress reports of the 2014 grant and the full proposal of the 2017 grant.) 9 1.1K 5K Richard H. Ebright @R_H_Ebright · Sep 6 The materials confirm the grants supported the construction--in Wuhan--of novel chimeric SARS-related coronaviruses that combined a spike gene from one coronavirus with genetic information from another coronavirus, and confirmed the resulting viruses could infect human cells. 207 3.4K 8.5K Richard H. Ebright @R_H_Ebright Replying to @R_H_Ebright The materials reveal that the resulting novel, laboratory-generated SARS-related coronaviruses also could infect mice engineered to display human receptors on cells ("humanized mice"). 6:33 PM · Sep 6, 2021·Twitter Web App 1,393 Retweets 28 Quote Tweets 5,464 Likes Tweet your reply Reply Richard H. Ebright @R_H_Ebright · Sep 6 Replying to @R_H_Ebright The materials further reveal for the first time that one of the resulting novel, laboratory-generated SARS-related coronaviruses--one not been previously disclosed publicly--was more pathogenic to humanized mice than the starting virus from which it was constructed... 25 1.5K 5.4K Richard H. Ebright @R_H_Ebright · Sep 6 ...and thus not only was reasonably anticipated to exhibit enhanced pathogenicity, but, indeed, was *demonstrated* to exhibit enhanced pathogenicity. 19 1.2K 5.1K Richard H. Ebright @R_H_Ebright · Sep 6 The materials further reveal that the the grants also supported the construction--in Wuhan--of novel chimeric MERS-related coronaviruses that combined spike genes from one MERS-related coronavirus with genetic information from another MERS-related coronavirus. 57 1.7K 5.8K Richard H. Ebright @R_H_Ebright · Sep 6 The documents make it clear that assertions by the NIH Director, Francis Collins, and the NIAID Director, Anthony Fauci, that the NIH did not support gain-of-function research or potential pandemic pathogen enhancement at WIV are untruthful. 846 8.9K 19.9K Tipu Osman @TipuOsman1 · 23h Replying to @R_H_Ebright what is humanized mice? Can somebody please explain. 4 Magril @Magril2 · Sep 6 Replying to @R_H_Ebright Cannot follow this completely, but am I right in concluding that they 1) built this virus, 2) tested it to see what would happen to humans if infected, and 3) we funded it!?? 6 2 20 Transplant MD PhD @transplnt_mdphd · Sep 7 No, no and no. This is conflating massively different things with little understanding to bolster a conspiracy theory and peddle this as proof of said conspiracy to those without the scientific training to understand that the docs actually *disprove* the conspiracy. 11 2 13 Show replies Steve Baldwin @honestlythnking · 3h Replying to @R_H_Ebright The 2014 grant specifically states, "No funds are provided and no funds can be used to support gain-of-function research covered under the October 17, 2014 White House Announcement (NIH Guide Notice NOT-OD-15-011)." on p 189 of the grant. 1 Richard H. Ebright @R_H_Ebright · 3h The progress reports of the 1R01 proposal and the aims of the the 2R01 proposal make it clear that--contrary to the quoted stipulation--EcoHealth/WIV perfomed gain of function research of concern and NIAD-OD knowing and willfully funded gain-of-function research of concern.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3484390/ In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic? - Anthony Fauci
Fauci trained and paid for the weaponization of a corona virus in a Chinese military lab...lied to Congress about it and is not in prison...but working for biden in the same job.