Once again let's review the status of the PMCPA review in the U.K. where no written finding has been released yet. Nor has Bourla been fined. Of course -- as usual -- you are quoting such a shiat source that you are unwilling to provide a link to it. First, let's outline the anti-vax group UsForThem associated with the initial article you pushed about the PMCPA situation -- noting that UsForThem is the set of anti-vax clowns who filed the complaint with the PMCPA -- most of which has been dismissed already. UsForThem is the group that created fake consent forms in the U.K. pretending to be from the NHS as well as handing out flyers with fake claims about vaccination in front of schools. This -- of course -- was when they were not sending fake legal summons to claiming crimes against humanity, etc. to school officials supporting vaccination. Currently the UsForThem group is pushing the Died Suddenly film which is completely filled with misinformation. UsForThem is so twisted in their anti-vax misinformation that the British Medical Journal published a paper documenting them - Understanding and neutralising covid-19 misinformation and disinformation. Secondly, let's note the primary "charges" against Pfizer CEO Bourla were DISMISSED by the PMCPA. Note the PMCPA has not published the results of their investigation on the final allegation regarding "disgracefully misleading claims" yet. Nothing has been substantiated. The article quoted by Becker is based on a leak to The Daily Telegraph. Let's go to a reputable source that covers the pharmaceutical industry - Fierce Pharma and read the second half of their article about this matter. But Pfizer hit back and had appealed against the rulings. In the end, the PMCPA overturned most of the serious breaches, according to The Telegraph. The way this news has come out is unusual. The PMCPA is self-regulatory body set up by the pharma industry, but it can and does enact some strict punishments if companies are found in breach of its marketing rules. In more serious cases, the findings are published in medical journals. These cases are always uploaded onto the PMCPA’s site and, when completed, are available for the public to read. But the Pfizer cases—officially titled: AUTH/3591/12/21 - A complaint on behalf of UsForThem v Pfizer—is as yet not completed. It appears as if the details have been shared with The Telegraph ahead of time but with no one else, which is not usual practice. The PMCPA told Fierce Pharma Marketing it could not say how or why this information had been seen by The Telegraph but a spokesperson said that they "anticipate that the case report will be published on our website before Christmas." “We are pleased the UK’s PMCPA Appeal Board found Pfizer to have maintained high standards and upheld confidence in our industry, the two most serious rulings in this complaint from a UK campaign group,” a Pfizer spokesman told Fierce Pharma Marketing. “In the U.K., we have always endeavoured to follow the principles and letter of our industry Code of Practice throughout. We will review the case report in detail when we receive it, to inform future activity.”
Dude cool under pressure. Impressive. https://www.facebook.com/v15.0/plugins/video.php?app_id=&channel=https://staticxx.facebook.com/x/connect/xd_arbiter/?version=46#cb=f2555a6e735fab4&domain=www.wusa9.com&is_canvas=false&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wusa9.com%2Fffa26d4050358e&relation=parent.parent&container_width=720&href=https://www.facebook.com/mattforva/videos/1280513859159570&locale=en_US&sdk=joey https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...lmed-entire-raid-shamed-puppets-regime-video/ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/
Truly nasty vaccine injury in a peer-reviewed case study. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35492355/ Lower extremity ulcers have significant morbidity, with treatment determined by the underlying disorder. Reported is a 32-year-old female presenting with small skin nodules and bruises across her legs 4 weeks following her second COVID vaccination. These lesions progressed into large, necrotic ulcers over several months. Initial work-up showed widespread pannicular thrombotic vasculopathy with ischemic skin necrosis. The tissue was negative for calcification on Von Kossa histochemistry, and a working diagnosis of subcutaneous thrombotic vasculopathy was suggested. Outcome: death. It took this poor woman a year to die from this murder shot. YES, SHE WAS MURDERED! I say it without reservation. Go ahead, normies (GWRB, etc.) - show your slavish allegiance to your pharmasters and your total lack of compassion for this level of suffering.
And if you read the full paper at Frontiers in Medicine https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2022.843793/full It states "Risk factors in patients without ESRD include female sex, obesity, hypercoagulability, autoimmune disorders, other connective tissue disorders, and medications such as Warfarin and corticosteroids (5, 7, 8). All such risk factors are present in this patient." It also outlines that there is no proven relationship between the Covid vaccine and this woman's idiopathic subcutaneous thrombotic vasculopathy.
Vaccine fertility crisis. Deep dive analysis. Worth the read. https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/..._id=89173359&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email
its only reasonable. remember when they decried that hospitals were overstating covid deaths by attributing all deaths to covid.
Let's take a look at reality. Just how many times do these fabricated "fertility claims" need to be debunked. And when are you going to stop posting dubious misinformation from substack blogs and social media sites Former MP misleads with births figure claim https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/former-mp-misleads-with-births-figure-claim/ WHAT WAS CLAIMED The number of births in Australia plummeted by 70 per cent in December 2021. OUR VERDICT Misleading. The claim compares finalised data with provisional figures and doesn't take into account a lag in birth registrations. The claim that the number of births in Australia dropped by 70 per cent in December 2021 - nine months after the launch of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout - is misleading. The claim compares provisional birth data with finalised figures and does not take into account a stated lag in birth registrations. Provisional birth data from previous years is comparable with the current provisional data for December 2021. Additionally, available finalised figures from individual states and territories show no fall in the number of births since the rollout of the COVID vaccine. (Much more at above url)
He was merely dehydrated --- not related to Covid vaccine --- despite all the false assertions you continuously push.