Nazis, racists, supporters of slavery, apparteid doers, have had the same/similar/equivalent beliefs to justify their crimes. One is then not surprised that you are a supporter of the killing of babies, women, elderly not to mention the other innocent civilians. President Jimmy Carter indicated that what you wrote above is a core reason for the problem in the middle east. So you are confirming his thesis. There are two other jewish guys, one will agree with you, the second will disagree (the first is scammer, the second is great mind): 1. The first jewish guy who would agree with you is Madoff. He may have thought that he was smarter than others, but forgot morality and truth. Time has shown that he less smart than others, but definitely immoral compared to others. 2. The second jewish guy who would disagree with you is one of the great Jewish people of all times. His name is Moshe ben Maimon. (You may know him by his nickname Rambam or Maimonides). I can tell you more about this to educate you a little more (in truth and not propaganda). Do some reading about Moshe, what he wrote, in which language he wrote, who taught him, and what he thinks about the topic you raised.
wow you are a fucking moron. Not only do you know nothing about foreign policy but you know nothing about cats either. Cats don't cover their shit because they want to Save others the displeaure of the smell. They do it because many predators use their sense of smell to find their prey so the smell of the shit would tell the cat's predators where he is. You are as dense as your handle suggests. Ps. America gives the fuckin ragheads 3 times more military aid than they do the Jews. Where is your outrage?
In the wild, the above may true, but dominant wild cats do not bury feces. The domestic cat though is different: "In the world of house cats, you [human] are the dominant animal and the house cat chooses not to offend you. They will carefully bury their feces to eliminate interfering with what they perceive as the natural order." http://www.sniksnak.com/cathealth/whydo.html
breaking news from middle east stating that Shalit (the prisoner of war in hands of Hamas) has been seriously injured in air strikes. Other reports are stating even sadder news (that he is dead). It is very sad that even prisoners of war have to be hit by the planes that killed other innocent babies, women and elderies. No respect for innocent life. Very sad.
Why so one-sided? With the exception of the children, Israeli and Palestinian, it seems to me innocence has been lost in the fighting. Why do you look past the sins of one group and focus on the sins of another?
Interesting article on Haaretz. Good job Tomer. " A child in Sderot is the same as a child in Gaza, and anyone who harms either is evil. But the assault on Gaza does not first and foremost demand moral condemnation - it demands a few historical reminders. Both the justification given for it and the chosen targets are a replay of the same basic assumptions that have proven wrong time after time. Yet Israel still pulls them out of its hat again and again, in one war after another. Israel is striking at the Palestinians to "teach them a lesson." That is a basic assumption that has accompanied the Zionist enterprise since its inception: We are the representatives of progress and enlightenment, sophisticated rationality and morality, while the Arabs are a primitive, violent rabble, ignorant children who must be educated and taught wisdom - via, of course, the carrot-and-stick method, just as the drover does with his donkey. The bombing of Gaza is also supposed to "liquidate the Hamas regime," in line with another assumption that has accompanied the Zionist movement since its inception: that it is possible to impose a "moderate" leadership on the Palestinians, one that will abandon their national aspirations. As a corollary, Israel has also always believed that causing suffering to Palestinian civilians would make them rebel against their national leaders. This assumption has proven wrong over and over. All of Israel's wars have been based on yet another assumption that has been with us from the start: that we are only defending ourselves. "Half a million Israelis are under fire," screamed the banner headline of Sunday's Yedioth Ahronoth - just as if the Gaza Strip had not been subjected to a lengthy siege that destroyed an entire generation's chances of living lives worth living. It is admittedly impossible to live with daily missile fire, even if virtually no place in the world today enjoys a situation of zero terror. But Hamas is not a terrorist organization holding Gaza residents hostage: It is a religious nationalist movement, and a majority of Gaza residents believe in its path. One can certainly attack it, and with Knesset elections in the offing, this attack might even produce some kind of cease-fire. But there is another historical truth worth recalling in this context: Since the dawn of the Zionist presence in the Land of Israel, no military operation has ever advanced dialogue with the Palestinians. Most dangerous of all is the cliche that there is no one to talk to. That has never been true. There are even ways to talk with Hamas, and Israel has something to offer the organization. Ending the siege of Gaza and allowing freedom of movement between Gaza and the West Bank could rehabilitate life in the Strip. At the same time, it is worth dusting off the old plans prepared after the Six-Day War, under which thousands of families were to be relocated from Gaza to the West Bank. Those plans were never implemented because the West Bank was slated to be used for Jewish settlement. And that was the most damaging working assumption of all. "
"The Israel Air Force used a new bunker-buster missile that it received recently from the United States in strikes against Hamas targets in the Gaza Strip on Saturday, The Jerusalem Post learned on Sunday."