I cannot understand the concept of stealing someone else's property. "We don't do the stealing. We have the government do that for us.''
I am not saying that you shouldn't be able to enjoy your wealth or that you shouldn't be able to leave a house to your child when you pass away.
Why can't all the Socialists, Marxists, Communists just leave America.. move to Venezuela or Cuba where they can be happy. Why do they insist on "reforming" the Capitalists to their greedy way of thinking? Oh, DUH! I forgot for a moment... IT'S THE CAPITALISTS WHO HAVE MONEY!
Capitalism within the context of global economy is not suitable and scalable. Hope somebody finds a comprehensive solution.
Eventually you will get your wish... in the New World Order. However after you've lived under it for a while, you'll regret ever hoping for it. It won't be a world where "everybody is well-off" or even "middle class". It will be still be one of "haves" (political elites) and "have nots" (everybody else.. likey, that means YOU.)
You are such a rabid, ignorant left-wing moron. This is pure proof once again that anytime you want to know the facts about anything, just look to the exact opposite of what a liberal blame-pointer says and there lies the truth. You bleeders are the master liars when it comes to failed social experiment/entitlement giveaways and then turn around and try to blame the other side for the horrible damage you have inflicted on this country after several decades of "progress". It has been social policies stuffed into our system (at both State and Federal levels) almost entirely by Democrats that has led to the huge social net and citizenship rights for children of illegals born here. I live in a border state with Mexico. It has ALWAYS been liberals that have blocked EVERY SINGLE conservative attempt to reign in immigration and socialist benefits for people who barely produce. The so-called greedy Right would never give ultra-expensive free emergency-room care, education and tens of thousands of dollars per year in direct and indirect benefits to each illegal here. This has been a purely Democratic boondoggle. Illegals are not high-producers, in fact they are the worst workers productivity-wise. They barely speak the language, only show up when they want to. Many are lazy or criminal. An employer has to hire extra spanish-speaking foremen that can manage them. There is a higher incidence of workplace theft and waste because they don't really care about the buisness nor do they really have any opportunity to advance. They are always the employee of last resort for any smart business. If anything, Republicans would want to bus them in/out on a guest worker program as cheaply as possible. They certainly don't aspire to give them social programs and entitlements. Where they have failed is allowing Dems to pack social pork into legislation, if anything they have sold out their principles to compromise with the left on this issue. Right now you have Obama and some socialist left-winger Governors suing Arizona for trying to get immigration under control! So why don't you accept the reality that it is the Democrats that want to expand their power and political base by pandering to the people of color in the US that have relatives affected by immigration reform?
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...n/06/rudy-giuliani/yep-reagan-did-the-a-word/ "Ronald Reagan did amnesty." Yep. Reagan did the A-word The GOP candidates keep sparring over who's tougher on immigration. In this climate, dem is fightin' words to say your opponent supports "sanctuary" or "amnesty" for illegal immigrants. But as Giuliani reminded his foes during the Jan. 5, 2008, Republican debate, none other than Ronald Reagan, the patron saint of modern-day conservatism, signed the very law that Republicans call amnesty. Say it ain't so! Sorry. It's so. In 1986, Reagan signed an immigration reform bill, the first in 20 years, that legalized the status for 1.7-million people.