US is doing better now not worst! ET trolls, too bad, you lose!

Discussion in 'Economics' started by smallfil, Jan 1, 2020.

  1. smallfil

    smallfil

    The future generations of Americans, our children and grandchildren depend on a robust economy with good paying jobs. President Donald Trump has done a marvelous job on the economy. I see no good reason not to continue with it. We have already seen the past economic failures under GH Bush, GW Bush, Carter, Clinton, Obama. Reagan was the lone US President who had even a bit of a clue still, none of them measure up to what President Donald Trump has done and he can still do some more good for the US. Another 4 years of huge economic growth and it would be very hard to top that.
     
    #21     Jan 1, 2020
    richie90 and richDude like this.
  2. richDude

    richDude

    That's probably a blame that should fall on both sides... considering the media coverage is 95% negative on Trump.
     
    #22     Jan 1, 2020
  3. Sig

    Sig

    I think there's a couple reasons why that "pox on both sides" false equivalency concept is very sad as well. Foremost is the fact that when the media reports Trump saying "I grab 'em by the pussy" or any of the other literally thousands of other appalling things he's actually said.....that's not the media's "fault" for "negative coverage". We need to put blame where blame belongs, it's a sad day indeed when anyone decides that the media reporting Trump saying "I grab em by the pussy" is somehow the media's fault and not Trump's and is anything but absolutely appalling and unacceptable.
    More importantly though, it's a very different thing to say "I get joy mainly from causing unhappiness in more than half the U.S. population and base my positions entirely on what will make them the most unhappy" and the idea of getting joy out of the missteps from one leader. The latter is somewhat unseemly and I wish liberals wouldn't engage in it (or conservatives who were oh so kind to Obama) The former is pitiful and awful in equal measure, don't you agree?
     
    #23     Jan 1, 2020
  4. RRY16

    RRY16

    SmallFill=Jem
     
    #24     Jan 1, 2020
  5. destriero

    destriero

    Your fuhrer is an addled, mouth breathing 80IQ blob:

    2020-01-01_08-57-45.png
     
    #25     Jan 1, 2020
    Frederick Foresight likes this.
  6. richDude

    richDude

    if net worth is a proxy of IQ, then what is your IQ?
     
    #26     Jan 1, 2020
  7. Sig

    Sig

    That's a very good question. If you calculated the compound returns on all of us here over our adult lifetimes you would find that the majority of us managed higher returns than Trump did on the money he was given by daddy. So while proposing the use of wealth as a proxy for IQ does nothing if not expose those with low IQs, its doubly moronic to ignore a massive initial wealth someone obtained through accident of birth!
     
    #27     Jan 1, 2020
  8. wartrace

    wartrace

    Uh did you read what I posted? I said I disliked Clinton MORE than I dislike Trump. Furthermore it seems that you do not understand I was referring to Hillary Clinton who was the democratic nominee in the last election if you recall. :rolleyes:
     
    #28     Jan 1, 2020
  9. destriero

    destriero


    Fallacious.

    Trump runs at an operating loss on 90% of his LLCs; so infinite?
     
    #29     Jan 1, 2020
    Frederick Foresight likes this.
  10. richDude

    richDude

    you have no knowledge of real estate do you... talk to a few successful landlords in your area you will understand.
     
    #30     Jan 1, 2020