The New Yorker WATCHING LEBANON by SEYMOUR M. HERSH Washingtonâs interests in Israelâs war. Issue of 2006-08-21 Posted 2006-08-14 In the days after Hezbollah crossed from Lebanon into Israel, on July 12th, to kidnap two soldiers, triggering an Israeli air attack on Lebanon and a full-scale war, the Bush Administration seemed strangely passive. âItâs a moment of clarification,â President George W. Bush said at the G-8 summit, in St. Petersburg, on July 16th. âItâs now become clear why we donât have peace in the Middle East.â He described the relationship between Hezbollah and its supporters in Iran and Syria as one of the âroot causes of instability,â and subsequently said that it was up to those countries to end the crisis. Two days later, despite calls from several governments for the United States to take the lead in negotiations to end the fighting, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said that a ceasefire should be put off until âthe conditions are conducive.â The Bush Administration, however, was closely involved in the planning of Israelâs retaliatory attacks. President Bush and Vice-President Dick Cheney were convinced, current and former intelligence and diplomatic officials told me, that a successful Israeli Air Force bombing campaign against Hezbollahâs heavily fortified underground-missile and command-and-control complexes in Lebanon could ease Israelâs security concerns and also serve as a prelude to a potential American preëmptive attack to destroy Iranâs nuclear installations, some of which are also buried deep underground. Israeli military and intelligence experts I spoke to emphasized that the countryâs immediate security issues were reason enough to confront Hezbollah, regardless of what the Bush Administration wanted. Shabtai Shavit, a national-security adviser to the Knesset who headed the Mossad, Israelâs foreign-intelligence service, from 1989 to 1996, told me, âWe do what we think is best for us, and if it happens to meet Americaâs requirements, thatâs just part of a relationship between two friends. Hezbollah is armed to the teeth and trained in the most advanced technology of guerrilla warfare. It was just a matter of time. We had to address it.â Full story: http://www.newyorker.com/printables/fact/060821fa_fact
I seriously pray for Americans to start seeing what nature of people control their government. They need to take back their governement before it's too late. The current govt is a tool for the NWO and I strongly suspect they plan to carry out a Henious attack on their own people many magnitudes worse than they did with sept 11. A act so serious that they can then proclaim martial law the next day. Way too many false flag operations under way. They're all leading up to the most henious of them all http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag
Christ zzzz, Any possible way to implicate the US in bad shit, and you do it. The US had ZERO to do with this shit, This is NOT good for the US in general. Israel will never eliminate Hez, simply cause they can't find em. Every bomb that levels a civilian local looks bad on the US. You are so fucking clueless that I usually don't even respond, but this takes the cake. The US would like this all to go away, period. Jay
Israeli Leaders Fault Bush on War By Robert Parry August 13, 2006 Amid the political and diplomatic fallout from Israelâs faltering invasion of Lebanon, some Israeli officials are privately blaming President George W. Bush for egging Prime Minister Ehud Olmert into the ill-conceived military adventure against the Hezbollah militia in south Lebanon. Bush conveyed his strong personal support for the military offensive during a White House meeting with Olmert on May 23, according to sources familiar with the thinking of senior Israeli leaders. Olmert, who like Bush lacks direct wartime experience, agreed that a dose of military force against Hezbollah might damage the guerrilla groupâs influence in Lebanon and intimidate its allies, Iran and Syria, countries that Bush has identified as the chief obstacles to U.S. interests in the Middle East. As part of Bushâs determination to create a ânew Middle Eastâ â one that is more amenable to U.S. policies and desires â Bush even urged Israel to attack Syria, but the Olmert government refused to go that far, according to Israeli sources. One source said some Israeli officials thought Bushâs attack-Syria idea was ânutsâ since much of the world would have seen the bombing campaign as overt aggression. In an article on July 30, the Jerusalem Post referred to Bushâs interest in a wider war involving Syria. Israeli âdefense officials told the Post last week that they were receiving indications from the US that America would be interested in seeing Israel attack Syria,â the newspaper reported. While balking at an expanded war into Syria, Olmert did agree on the need to show military muscle in Lebanon as a prelude to facing down Iran over its nuclear program, which Olmert has called an âexistentialâ threat to Israel. With U.S. forces bogged down in Iraq, Bush and his neoconservative advisers saw the inclusion of Israeli forces as crucial for advancing a strategy that would punish Syria for supporting Iraqi insurgents, advance the confrontation with Iran and isolate Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Gaza. But the month-long war has failed to achieve its goals of destroying Hezbollah forces in south Lebanon or intimidating Iran and Syria. Instead, Hezbollah guerrillas fought Israeli troops to a virtual standstill in villages near the border and much of the world saw Israelâs bombing raids across Lebanon â which killed hundreds of civilians â as âdisproportionate.â Now, as the conflict winds down, some Israeli officials are ruing the Olmert-Bush pact on May 23 and fault Bush for pushing Olmert into the conflict. Building Pressure Soon after the May 23 meeting in Washington, Israel began to ratchet up pressure on the Hamas-led government in the Palestinian territories and on Hezbollah and other Islamic militants in Lebanon. As part of this process, Israel staged low-key attacks in both Lebanon and Gaza. [For details, see Consortiumnews.com âA âPretextâ War in Lebanon.â] The tit-for-tat violence led to the Hamas seizure of an Israeli soldier on June 24 and then to Israeli retaliatory strikes in Gaza. That, in turn, set the stage for Hezbollahâs attack on an Israeli outpost and the capture of two more Israeli soldiers on July 12. Hezbollahâs July 12 raid became the trigger that Bush and Olmert had been waiting for. With the earlier attacks unknown or forgotten, Israel and the U.S. skillfully rallied international condemnation of Hezbollah for what was called an unprovoked attack and a âkidnappingâ of Israeli soldiers. Behind the international criticism of Hezbollah, Bush and Olmert justified an intense air campaign against Lebanese targets, killing civilians and destroying much of Lebanonâs commercial infrastructure. Israeli troops also crossed into southern Lebanon with the intent of delivering a devastating military blow against Hezbollah, which retaliated by firing Katyusha rockets into Israel.. However, the Israeli operation was eerily reminiscent of the disastrous U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq. Like the U.S. assault, Israel relied heavily on âshock and aweâ air power and committed an inadequate number of soldiers to the battle. Israeli newspapers have been filled with complaints from soldiers who say some reservists werenât issued body armor while other soldiers found their equipment either inferior or inappropriate to the battlefield conditions. Israeli troops also encountered fierce resistance from Hezbollah guerrillas, who took a page from the Iraqi insurgents by using explosive booby traps and ambushes to inflict heavier than expected casualties on the Israelis. Channel 2 in Israel disclosed that several top military commanders wrote a letter to Lt. Gen. Dan Halutz, the chief of staff, criticizing the war planning as chaotic and out of line with the combat training of the soldiers and officers. [Washington Post, Aug. 12, 2006] One Israeli plan to use llamas to deliver supplies in the rugged terrain of south Lebanon turned into an embarrassment when the animals simply sat down. Reporter Nahum Barnea, who traveled with an Israeli unit in south Lebanon, compared the battle to âthe famous Tom and Jerry cartoonsâ with the powerful Israeli military playing the role of the cat Tom and the resourceful Hezbollah guerrillas playing the mouse Jerry. âIn every conflict between them, Jerry wins,â Barnea wrote. Olmert Criticized Back in Israel, some leading newspapers have begun calling for Olmertâs resignation. âIf Olmert runs away now from the war he initiated, he will not be able to remain prime minister for even one more day,â the newspaper Haaretz wrote in a front-page analysis. âYou cannot lead an entire nation to war promising victory, produce humiliating defeat and remain in power. âYou cannot bury 120 Israelis in cemeteries, keep a million Israelis in shelters for a month and then say, âOops, I made a mistake.ââ [See Washington Post, Aug. 12, 2006] For his part, Bush spent July and early August fending off international demands for an immediate cease-fire. Bush wanted to give Olmert as much time as possible to bomb targets across Lebanon and dislodge Hezbollah forces in the south. But instead of turning the Lebanese population against Hezbollah â as Washington and Tel Aviv had hoped â the devastation rallied public support behind Hezbollah. As the month-long conflict took on the look of a public-relations disaster for Israel, the Bush administration dropped its resistance to international cease-fire demands and joined with France in crafting a United Nations plan for stopping the fighting. Quoting âa senior administration officialâ with Bush at his ranch in Crawford, Texas, the New York Times reported that âit increasingly seemed that Israel would not be able to achieve a military victory, a reality that led the Americans to get behind a cease-fire.â [NYT, Aug. 12, 2006] But the repercussions from Israelâs failed Lebanon offensive are likely to continue. Olmert must now confront the political damage at home and the chief U.S. adversaries in the Middle East may be emboldened by the outcome, more than chastened. As in the Iraq War, Bush has revealed again how reliance on tough talk and military might can sometimes undercut â not build up â U.S. influence in the strategically important Middle East. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at secrecyandprivilege.com. It's also available at Amazon.com, as is his 1999 book, Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & 'Project Truth.' http://www.consortiumnews.com/2006/081206.html
A 'Pretext' War in Lebanon By Robert Parry August 9, 2006 Three days after the May 23 summit between Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and U.S. President George W. Bush, a car bomb killed two officials of Islamic Jihad in the Lebanese city of Sidon. Immediately, Lebanese officials, including Prime Minister Fouad Siniora, denounced the murder of brothers Nidal and Mahmoud Majzoub and pointed the finger at Israel as the prime suspect. On June 10, a man named Mahmoud Rafeh was arrested for the car bombing and, according to the Lebanese army, confessed that he was a Mossad agent. Rafeh, a 59-year-old retired police officer, belonged to a âterror network working for the Israeli Mossad,â which had smuggled a booby-trapped door into Lebanon from Israel for use in the assassination, the Lebanese army said. In retrospect, the Majzoub assassination looks to have been part of a larger U.S.-Israeli strategy â following the Olmert-Bush summit â to encourage a tit-for-tat escalation of violence that would ratchet up pressure on Palestinian and Lebanese militants â and through them their allies in Syria and Iran. That violence also set the stage for the current Israeli-Lebanese war, which now has raged for almost one month and has claimed the lives of nearly 1,000 Lebanese and 100 Israelis. A Year for War According to Israeli sources, Olmert and Bush agreed at the May 23 summit to make 2006 the year for neutralizing Iranâs nuclear ambitions, while deferring a border settlement with the Palestinians until 2007. Provoking a wider regional conflict also revived hopes among Bushâs neoconservative advisers that they might yet create a ânew Middle Eastâ that would be amenable to U.S. and Israeli desires and interests. In this context, the Israeli-Lebanese war was a confrontation looking for a pretext, not an ad hoc response to Hezbollahâs capture of two Israeli soldiers on July 12. That so-called âkidnappingâ has been sold to the American people and many world leaders as the precipitating event for the conflict, but it now appears only to have been a trigger for a prearranged scheme. Israeli sources indicate that Bush gave Olmert a green light for the conflict at the May 23 summit. The sources said Bush has even encouraged Israel to expand the war by attacking Syria, although Israeli leaders balked at that recommendation because they lacked an immediate justification. One Israeli source said some Israeli officials considered Bushâs interest in an attack on Syria ânutsâ since it would have been viewed by much of the world as an act of overt aggression. Bush, however, is said to still hold out hope that reactions by Syria or Iran â such as coming to the aid of Hezbollah â could open the door to a broader conflict. In an article on July 30, the Jerusalem Post hinted at Bushâs continued interest in a wider war involving Syria. âDefense officials told the Post last week that they were receiving indications from the US that America would be interested in seeing Israel attack Syria,â the newspaper reported. Bush pursued a similar âpretextâ war strategy in 2003 when he sought a provocation by Iraq that would give legal cover for invading that country. A leaked British document recounted an Oval Office meeting between Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair on Jan. 31, 2003. Even as Bush was publicly telling the American people that he viewed war with Iraq as a âlast resort,â he had already made up his mind and was scheming to find excuses for justifying an attack on Iraq. According to minutes written by Blairâs top foreign policy aide David Manning, âthe U.S. was thinking of flying U-2 reconnaissance aircraft with fighter cover over Iraq, painted in U.N. colours. If Saddam fired on them, he would be in breach.â Regardless of whether a casus belli could be provoked, Bush already had âpenciled inâ March 10, 2003, as the start of the U.S. bombing of Iraq, according to the memo. âOur diplomatic strategy had to be arranged around the military planning,â Manning wrote. As it turned out, Bush brushed aside Blairâs worries about the legality of an unprovoked invasion of Iraq and went ahead with the assault on March 19, 2003. Though Iraqâs dictator Saddam Hussein was ousted after a three-week U.S.-led assault, Iraqi insurgents have battled the American occupying army since then in a war that has claimed the lives of almost 2,600 U.S. soldiers and tens of thousands of Iraqis. New Ambitions Many American observers believed that the disaster in Iraq would tamp down Bushâs ambition to remake the region. However, with Olmertâs ascension to power in Israel in 2006, Bush saw a kindred spirit who believed that military force was the only way to get Islamic adversaries to make necessary concessions. After the May 23 meeting with Bush, Olmert declared that âthis is a moment of truthâ for addressing Iranâs alleged ambitions to build a nuclear bomb. In a speech to a joint session of Congress on May 24, Olmert called the possibility of Iran building a nuclear weapon âan existential threatâ to Israel, meaning that Israel believed its very existence was in danger. Two days later, the car bomb killed the Majzoub brothers in Sidon and a new cycle of escalation began. In reaction to the assassinations, Islamic militants fired rockets into Israel, which, in turn, counter-attacked killing one Hezbollah fighter. Tensions rose further when fighting between Israelis and Palestinians resumed in Gaza. On the night of June 23, Israeli commandos crossed into Gaza and seized Osama and Mustafa Abu Muamar, two sons of Hamas activist Ali Muamar. [BBC, June 24, 2006] Early on the morning of June 24, Hamas militants snuck into Israel via a tunnel from Gaza and attacked an Israel patrol, killing two soldiers and capturing Corporal Gilad Shalit as a part of a demand for a prisoner exchange. Israel is reported to hold about 10,000 Palestinian prisoners. On June 27, as these tensions mounted, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas was still working to advance a possible peace settlement with Israel. Abbas coaxed the more radical Hamas, which controls the Palestinian parliament, into endorsing a document proposing a Palestinian state alongside Israel. Abbasâs success represented a potential breakthrough in a border settlement with Israel, since Hamas implicitly was accepting Israel as a neighbor next to an independent Palestinian state. But the next day, June 28, Olmert sent the Israeli army crashing into Gaza to avenge the âkidnappingâ of Shalit, a phrasing that the U.S. news media immediately adopted in blaming Hamas for instigating the crisis. As the Israeli army overwhelmed scattered Palestinian resistance and began âdetainingâ â not âkidnappingâ â Hamas legislators, tensions were also mounting on the Israeli-Lebanese border. On July 12, Hezbollah forces attacked an Israeli border outpost, killing three soldiers and capturing â or âkidnappingâ â two others, also seeking a prisoner exchange. The July 12 incident opened up the floodgates of violence. Israel launched a broad air-and-ground offensive aimed at crushing Hezbollah by blasting apart its strongholds in south Lebanon and destroying much of Lebanonâs economic infrastructure, from roads to communications. Hezbollah launched hundreds of Katyusha rockets into northern Israel. Besides the almost 1,000 Lebanese who have died, an estimated one million â or about one-fourth of Lebanon's population â were displaced from their homes. The Israeli death toll, both military and civilian, stood at about 100. While many international leaders called for an immediate cease-fire to stop the bloodshed in July, Bush staunchly defended Israelâs actions as a legitimate act of self-defense against âterrorists.â In an unguarded moment during the G-8 summit in Russia on July 17, Bush â speaking with his mouth full of food â told Blair âwhat they need to do is get Syria to get Hezbollah to stop doing this shit.â Not realizing that a nearby microphone was turned on, Bush also complained about suggestions for a cease-fire and an international peacekeeping force. âWeâre not blaming Israel and weâre not blaming the Lebanese government,â Bush said, suggesting that the blame should fall on others, presumably Hezbollah, Syria and Iran. (cont.)
Meanwhile, John Bolton, Bushâs ambassador to the United Nations, suggested that the United States would only accept a multilateral U.N. force if it had the capacity to take on Hezbollah's backers in Syria and Iran. âThe real problem is Hezbollah,â Bolton said. âWould it [a U.N. force] be empowered to deal with countries like Syria and Iran that support Hezbollah?â [NYT, July 18, 2006] âCease-Fireâ By early August, as rage throughout the Middle East rose to a boil, the Bush administration finally put forth a cease-fire plan. But it read as if it were designed to further stir Arab anger and extend the conflict. While demanding that Hezbollah stop fighting and effectively disarm, it would allow Israeli forces to remain in south Lebanon and only require Israel to cease âoffensiveâ operations. A multinational force would then replace the Israeli army and police a buffer zone carved entirely out of south Lebanon. Bush said his cease-fire goal was to strike at the âroot causeâ of the conflict, the existence of Hezbollah as an armed militia inside Lebanon. âBy taking these steps, it will prevent armed militias like Hezbollah and its Iranian and Syrian sponsors from sparking another crisis,â Bush said at an Aug. 7 news conference in Crawford, Texas. âThe loss of life on both sides of the Lebanese-Israeli border has been a great tragedy,â Bush said. âMillions of Lebanese civilians have been caught in the crossfire of military operations because of the unprovoked attack and kidnappings by Hezbollah. The humanitarian crisis in Lebanon is of deep concern to all Americans, and alleviating it will remain a priority of my government.â But the reality appears to be quite different. Much as Bush told the American people that he considered war with Iraq âa last resortâ long after he had decided to invade, Bush is now saying his goal is to relieve a humanitarian crisis when he actually hopes to expand the conflict and force a showdown with Syria and Iran. While U.S. officials have been careful not to link the Lebanon conflict to any possible military action against Iranâs nuclear facilities, they have spoken privately about using the current conflict to counter growing Iranian influence. Only days after the Lebanon-Israel conflict began, Washington Post foreign policy analyst Robin Wright wrote that U.S. officials told her that âfor the United States, the broader goal is to strangle the axis of Hezbollah, Hamas, Syria and Iran, which the Bush administration believes is pooling resources to change the strategic playing field in the Middle East. ⦠âWhatever the outrage on the Arab streets, Washington believes it has strong behind-the-scenes support among key Arab leaders also nervous about the populist militants â with a tacit agreement that the timing is right to strike.â [Washington Post, July 16, 2006] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at secrecyandprivilege.com. It's also available at Amazon.com, as is his 1999 book, Lost History: Contras, Cocaine, the Press & 'Project Truth.' http://www.consortiumnews.com/2006/080806.html
US helped to plan and push Israel war? I doubt it but if we did, who gives a ratâs ass? So what? I hope we did. Get over it. It's amazing how so many people get stuck on stupid when Islamists fight Jews. As if itâs no longer a threat to anyone else. Just get rid of Israel and the enemy will leave us alone. LOL. When liberals finally wake up it's always too late.
Another example of the absolute fucking STUPIDITY that passes for intellect in the neocon political platform. Kid you're SO GODDAMNED FUCKING STUPID!! Does'nt your head hurt when you try to think? I'm just curious. Boy, what a DUMB ASS Retard.