US going to hell in a hand basket?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by axeman, May 12, 2003.

  1. Vengeance? Beyond rationality? Please, your interpretation apparently emanates from your own emotional way of posting on ET. The truth is all that was sought from RSX.X and the content as well as the quantity of his many worded posts revealed not much of that. Plenty of histrionics though, besides his open attacks and other whining, the guy actually claimed he was never ever going to post to ET on three separate instances. I find the usage of the word "stalking" amusing and please remember this term was solely the origination of RSX.X in many of his "crybaby" posts and he hardly had much choice in his attempt to save face. Sorry, but it's not my problem that ol' RSX.X trapped himself with his own BS.

    So, if you are relying on your personal interpretation of ET or RSX.X's many claims professing stalking, attacking and all his other accusations, then, in my opinion, your source is highly suspect for reliability as well as reality.
     
    #201     May 20, 2003
  2. Who cares if RSX.x was shoveling shit or not? It is not like he was going to profit financially from it. If you know it is BS, what is the payoff?

    What is the reward for "outing" an anonymous handle on the internet who is spouting bullshit and lies? Who the fuck would care what an anonymous person would say?

    Your obsession with him is not rational, and I will wager that any licensed clinical psychologist would agree that the time you spent in pursuit of the "truth" from an anonymous poster on a message board speaks volumes to your mental health and emotional development.
     
    #202     May 20, 2003
  3. RSX.X, you gonna sit there and take this irrational attack on your being? In any event, thank you 7x3 for confirmation on RSX.X.

    The "reward" is to defeat the opposition debater's claims and thus put one's own opinion accross succesfully. If no one cares about "spouting bullshit and lies" then any debate, about any subject, is pretty much useless.
     
    #203     May 20, 2003
  4. You deftly refuse to deal with the issue.

    Let's assume the RS or anyone else is lying. Let's assume that you have proved it via debate.

    Let's assume it has no effect on RS, and he continues his behavior.

    Why would you continue to maintain your course of action then?

    Is that sane?

    Why would it matter to try to prove him a liar anyway?

    Who the fuck cares, but you?

    Is he trying to sell a product or service, for which lying would be an issue?

    He is just an anonymous handle, right? No emotional reaction from your side, right?
     
    #204     May 20, 2003
  5. ElCubano

    ElCubano

    How MAX401 can deny his obsession ( very emotionally fuled I might add) with proving rs7 wrong when in fact countless other posters pointed out how worthless his pursuit was is just MAX401 for ya....you gotta love this fucker....
     
    #205     May 20, 2003
  6. I admit to being wrong in responding to Max's interrogations.

    He said I lied when I mentioned I was in Chamonix. I posted my ski pass, and he used a photo manipulation program to change my picture to a Pinocchio nosed joke.

    He said I lied when I mentioned I was in Monte Carlo. I posted photographs from my hotel room obviously taken by a 4 year old, and photos of my 4 year old on the beach and also at a festival. He of course claimed that it was "just a child" and proved nothing.

    Then he made a big deal out of asking me "where" I was issued my visa. I answered "Chicago". At which point he jumped for joy in that he caught me in a lie....because visas were not required to enter France. Yet then I scanned and posted my French visa, and he then claimed that he "lied" to try and prove that I had lied.:confused: Because in actuality, a visa WAS required at that time. (so Max is permitted to lie...."for the greater good" I suppose).

    He said I lied when I talked about trading on the CBOE. So I gave him the names and phone numbers of people at First Options with whom he could have easily verified my statements. That would have been no fun, so he just continued to call me a liar.

    I talked about my experiences in Southeast Asia in the army. He called me a liar, and I admitted that some of what I said was an exaggeration in that I talked about some of my brother in law's experiences and combined them with my own. All to make a point, which was that there is no glory in war. This got Max into a rage. NO EMOTIONS? PLEASE!!!!

    Max implied to me that he would be in my neighborhood, which he knows is Boca Raton/West Palm Beach. I offered to buy him drinks. And dinner. His response was to change MY offer, and take him for dinner in (and pay for his airfare to) Monaco.

    Then I suggest that Max and I could, instead of "banging heads", have a real debate. On any subject. Not choosing which side of the issue to debate, but having that chosen for us. He has evaded this quite adeptly. I said "emotions" came into play, and I wanted to prove this did not have to be the case. Yet somehow, he claims that "emotions" have no place on a message board. Yet no one is more emotional than Max. Perhaps "passionate" is a better word. He is "passionate" about his fanatical pursuit of being antagonistic. He is "passionate" about his pursuit of the facts of the lives of others. And he is "passionate" about his desire to remain totally anonymous and will not divulge a single thing about himself. Not where he lives (not even what hemisphere), what or if he trades, his age; NOTHING.

    So he will not have drinks or dinner with me, or with anyone. Because he is apparently afraid to be "found out". What it is he is hiding, I have no idea. But clearly he is very afraid of something.

    I now feel sorry for Max. I really thought the "debate" would be his cup of tea. But apparently he is afraid to rise to the "challenge". This is the sure sign of a small minded and narrow minded fanatic.

    Max says no one "stalks". Yet it is clearly obvious that he went back and read posts I made months and months earlier looking for contradictions. When that did not pan out for him, he just used his "charm" to try to "prove" whatever I said was devoid of veracity.

    Really sad. I now picture Max in some little basement room in his parents house, with his computer books and Windows for Dummy's collection

    At least he has his internet access and his political views. Which are clearly those of someone who takes the words of his "favorite pundits" as gospel. He doesn't even realize that the very people he listens to are in the entertainment business, and not as serious about their public reactionary views as Max himself is.

    Max lives in a world of black and white.

    The only thing I know for sure about Max in a personal sense, is this. If MAX is his last name, PETER is not his first name.

    Black and white. And devoid of humor.


    Peace,
    RS
     
    #206     May 20, 2003
  7. Hey, I didn't look in a Crystal Ball and determine RSX.X's veracity. I asked questions to test my theory and his responses were wanting. The payoff is I don't waste a whole of time with certain RSX.X viewpoints. However, since you seem to care not one wit that someone could be completely fulla bulla and generally have no credibility on certain issues, be my guest!
     
    #207     May 20, 2003
  8. Hah! I lie awake most nights thinking about it!
     
    #208     May 20, 2003
  9. RSX.X, I see you have this repetitive diatribe all set up in your word processor for easy pasting as I've seen you post it several times now. Looks like you have been embellishing it further. Nice work. BTW, where did this occur: "He said I lied when I talked about trading on the CBOE."

    Should I go through all your points above and rebut? Why? I've already done that a few times, yet you ignore those rebuttals and have no response except to simply go back to reliance on your original logically faulty lame laments.

    Your ad hominem attacks are really revealing how frustrated you are. Hey, I didn't put you in this predicament, you did. Now, if you'll excuse me, I must go toss some furniture around, I'm just in such a rage. Sheesh..........!
     
    #209     May 20, 2003
  10. Whatever Max. People will make up their own minds. The vote is in and has been for quite some time.

    So go ahead and continue your antagonistic ways. It doesn't bother me, rather I find it quite amusing. And my LEGITIMATE OFFER to buy you drinks and dinner still stands. I remain very curious as to who and what you really are. No one can be as much a caricature of themselves as you appear to be. So maybe (and I am hoping this is the case) you really are an amusing and friendly guy, and that Max401 is just an act to amuse yourself. And your true persona is more like that of Optional or FPC, or MrSubliiminal, or Tampa, or ElCubano. Or Nitro, or Baron, or Babak, or even Don Bright. Any one of a huge number of bright and imaginative ET members. Someone with exceptional intellect, and Max401 is his own "inside joke". What about it Max? When do we meet?

    And if I am wrong, and you really are exactly what you appear to be, then why are you afraid of the "debate" challenge?

    Out of curiosity....why quote my entire post? Do you think people cannot read something once? Are you so enamored with what I say that you feel it needs repeating?

    And while you sarcastically deny being in a rage, you are so eager to post that you don't have the extra few seconds to use the spell checker? As you would say ...."sheesh"...you sure are being reckless. This seem to be a little obsessive especially for someone who (at least ostensibly) is as anal retentive as you. Please don't go over the edge Max. We need you here. You ARE the counterpoint for reason and sanity! The healthy dose of the "other side". We can't afford to lose you!

    Peace my Brother Max,
    :)RS

    PS: No Max, no word processing, no cut and paste. You are a self proclaimed expert on RSx.x.....you should know better.
     
    #210     May 20, 2003