US Economic Policy

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Yannis, May 4, 2011.

  1. Look the resources always have and always will be controlled and dispersed by the ruling elite. We call this type of person a Dealmaker. These are the businesspeople that see "Resource A is needed at Location B. I am going to buy it, transport it and then sell it at a profit."

    When you have this type of power it is easy to be irresponsible with it. And lets face it, a man may have many winters under his belt but he is still a child inside making decisions based on personal experience.

    What I'm saying is we got into this mess because the ruling elite aka businesspeople and politicians were irresponsible. Obama (responsible or irresponsible, take your pick) did what he thought was the right thing to do and well... it may not have been 100% for the good of everyone. People in power have to learn to leave differences behind and fix the problems.
     
    #51     Aug 12, 2011
  2. Yannis

    Yannis

    This Nails It

    [​IMG]

    :) :) :)
     
    #52     Aug 16, 2011
  3. JWS11

    JWS11

    Think About this

    <object style="height: 390px; width: 640px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xQf_QfitmKE?version=3"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xQf_QfitmKE?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></object>

    :( :( :(
     
    #53     Aug 16, 2011
  4. Yannis

    Yannis

    The Obama/Bernanke New Dollar Bill

    [​IMG]

    :) :) :)
     
    #54     Aug 18, 2011
  5. Yannis

    Yannis

    Nuke the News: What a Great Economy
    From imao.us


    * Obama wants to assure us that we’re not in danger of another recession… but if things do stall, it’s because people disagreed with him and didn’t do what he told them. Other presidents — also known as better presidents — somehow dealt with congresses that disagreed with them and got things done. Obama had huge majorities in the Senate and the House and somehow still struggled at everything, and now that he’s lost that his only idea to try and make things happen is constant whining. How do you make an argument that this guy is not a horrible leader? Does the first step involve drilling a hole in your own head?

    * Apparently, Obama has been avoiding black communities on his bus tour. Why would he need to talk to black people and assure them everything will be all right? They only have like twice the unemployment of everyone else.

    Of course, it’s obvious why he isn’t visiting black people. This tour is to convince people to vote for Obama in 2012, but he doesn’t need to do that for blacks. They have to vote for Obama because they’re black. They have no choice in the matter. If you’re black, you vote for the Democrat. So Obama can just ignore them his whole presidency and then come election time have some advocacy group claim the Republican is going to burn crosses to scare them into voting as they’re supposed to. Is this news to black people? Hasn’t this agreement been going on for decades?

    * Obama has reached a new low on his handling the economy — only 26% approve. And you gotta kinda wonder what in the world it is those 26% are approving of. Maybe some people don’t like economies and want them destroyed.

    But don’t worry: Obama has a new jobs plan. Aren’t we excited.

    [​IMG]

    All his other plans were complete and utter failures, but this time he’s sure to get it right! Apparently, we won’t get the plan until he comes back from his next vacation. Which leads to my job plan: Obama does nothing but vacation for the rest of his presidency. By now, it’s pretty obvious that most useful thing he’s capable of doing is staying out of the way.

    Actually, he hasn’t proved he’s capable of that."

    :p
     
    #55     Aug 18, 2011