Urgent Message From Rennick

Discussion in 'Trading' started by William Rennick, Jul 17, 2007.

  1. HHHHEEEEEELLLLLPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!

    STOP IT!!!

    You can save a WHOLE LOT OF TIME AND ENERGY (GRUFF) by simply stating 1 YM contract is BTO or STO at xx:xx am or pm and STC or BTC at xx:xx per the "Ball"'s invocation.

    Points gained or lost from ANY call could VERY EASILY be evaluated AS EACH DAY PROGRESSES.

    Only then will you have an accurate tally of WR's accurate or inaccurate use of the "Ball". If others feel they could use it more accurately simply post and we'll keep a tally.

    And those of you that have been simply watching and moaning all these years can continue to sit and watch - BUT THE RESULTS WILL SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES.

    THEN make your comments. In the meantime let "Q" keep posting his God-awfullly funny pics and let the ol' boy keep wringing our necks with his prose!!

    :D

    As they say. . .anything else would be <i>"uncivilized"</i>

    pay$$
     
    #2671     Aug 26, 2008
  2. contrary

    contrary

    So I take it you agree to >0.5% = neutral?

    Will get rid of the old tally, as things will be broken down now:

    Neutral calls:
    1 correct
    0 incorrect

    Strong calls:
    0 correct
    0 incorrect

    Weak calls:
    0 correct
    0 incorrect
     
    #2672     Aug 26, 2008
  3. Actually 0.5% is pretty fair. Why get rid of all the past call tallies, since neutral calls are now separated?

    Get rid of the win % mentality!

    :eek:

    It is only my bias or feeling, but since following this thread - my take is that when the "Ball" is correct it racks up a LOT more points than those lost when it is wrong. Mind you this is not compiled from an accurate review of past data. . .it is just my feeling.

    So you see, if this is true - the current analysis of the "Ball"'s effectiveness is basically rendered USELESS!

    That is if success is defined as making <b>$$$</b> versus being "right" or "wrong", which I know is a key factor amongst many, many ET members.

    pS
     
    #2673     Aug 26, 2008
  4. Awww, this is idiotic. You can fuck off now.
     
    #2674     Aug 26, 2008
  5. contrary

    contrary

    Make me.
     
    #2675     Aug 26, 2008
  6. Now THAT is <i>priceless</i>!



    :D :D :D :D
     
    #2676     Aug 26, 2008
  7. Good job on breaking down the calls. Now fill in the old ones....OR YOU'RE FIRED!

    The official tally according to your count is now 9 correct 7 wrong
    My count is 10 correct 6 wrong*

    *3 of those were fulfilled the next morning and from a traders perspective were great calls.

    Rack em up Beansie, again good job on the new format. Your neck is still on the chopping block until you fill in the old calls.

    Rennick out:cool:
     
    #2677     Aug 26, 2008
  8. contrary

    contrary

    Go fuck yourself Willie. The old tally had everything combined. I'm not going back to figure out which call goes in which of 6 columns now.

    To alleviate additional concerns, I will also keep net points gained/lost info for each column.

    Neutral calls:
    1 correct, net gain/loss: +20
    0 incorrect

    Strong calls:
    0 correct
    0 incorrect

    Weak calls:
    0 correct
    0 incorrect
     
    #2678     Aug 26, 2008
  9. The coordinates Ivan, I need the coordinates. Once logged into the Chieftains GPS system this Sucker is going know what 28,000 pounds of Detroit steel crashing through a Public library feels like.
    To all the innocent people in there I have 2 words, GET DOWN !!

    Rennick out:cool:
     
    #2679     Aug 26, 2008
  10. If I had as pathetic a winning % as 56% I would be happy that someone wiped the slate clean.
     
    #2680     Aug 26, 2008