<img src='http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/default/files/styles/image_full_width_scaled/hash/a9/c8/a9c8a4aeae925282f080160aeaa81408.jpg'>
if you watch RCP poll average for president. they are throwing out newer tighter polls and keeping older polls showing greater Obama leads. The spread is plus 4 for Obama but if they used the newer polls only the number would drop to plus 3. It would change the while story running in the media now.
Its good see some righites going on the record supporting this nonsense.When Obama wins we have documented proof of their intelligence levels
Even Scott Rasmussen wants nothing to do with those looney polls Even the founder of Rasmussen Reports, whose surveys often show higher Republican numbers, cast doubt on Chambers' methods: Scott Rasmussen told BuzzFeed in an e-mail that "you cannot compare partisan weighting from one polling firm to another." "Different firms ask about partisan affiliation in different ways," explained Rasmussen. "Some ask how you are registered. Some ask what you consider yourselves. Some push for leaners, others do not. Some ask it at the beginning of a survey which provides a more stable response while others ask it at the end."
And that's what we've been telling you: most polls out there are liberal and produce fake results to raise dem enthusiasm and encourage them to donate to Obama. Here's something else that's relevant: http://video.foxnews.com/v/1863079594001/
While I don't believe the unskewed polls either, arguing with AK47 and expecting him to embrace logic is a lost cause.
Having raised two good, smart and extremely strong willed children, I know the drill: stay the course, repeat often, be patient...
Yes, but your children aren't learning impaired. Ever hear the "you can lead a horse to water, but can't make him drink" analogy? That describes AK47 quite well.
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/24/the-statistical-state-of-the-presidential-race/ Reagan +3.4