Unemployment Hits 4-year Low !!!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by AK Forty Seven, Mar 8, 2013.

  1. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    When you gonna start calling out RCG and futurecunts for all their "6th grade attacks"?
     
    #51     Mar 10, 2013
  2. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    ...as well you should.

    Exactly.
     
    #52     Mar 10, 2013
  3. Mav88

    Mav88

    What's truly sad is that little boys like you think this is good times simply because your messiah is in power. This type of data, especially given the massive amount of gov't deficit spending, used to be really disappointing.

    We had a better jobs economy and more people working 29 fricken years ago, when the economy was about half this size. I guess I should not expect a little leftist to understand, or even care really, just know that your propaganda is seen for what it is. Go ahead fool yourself if you want but you are wasting time if you think a functioning adults agree with you.

    http://money.cnn.com/2012/05/04/news/economy/obama-reagan-recovery/index.htm


     
    #53     Mar 10, 2013
  4. So under Bush food stamp use doubled and he didnt inherit the economy Obama did :(
     
    #54     Mar 10, 2013
  5. Was Reagan losing 500,000-800,000 jobs a month when he came into office ?
     
    #55     Mar 10, 2013
  6. Mav88

    Mav88

    It's on pace to quadruple under obama
     
    #56     Mar 10, 2013
  7. Mav88

    Mav88

    reagan inherited stagflation and a nasty recession induced to stop inflation, but the point is little boy, that this is not in any sense a good recovery. There is no reason to cheer, if you are a rational adult.
     
    #57     Mar 10, 2013
  8. So Reagan wasnt losing 500,000 to 800,000 jobs a month when he came into office,thanks
     
    #58     Mar 10, 2013
  9. I can only imagine how much it would have increased if Bush had inherited the economy he left Obama :(
     
    #59     Mar 10, 2013
  10. Mav88

    Mav88

    Starting at the bottom should be a huge advantage in terms of numbers, but since the labor market was also smaller, then the rate of loss should be smaller.

    When properly scaled and normalized, this is the worst post world war II recovery. All the numbers show it, and this is despite the massive stimulus. Only an idiot would cheer that, so put on your pointy hat little boy.
     
    #60     Mar 10, 2013