Unemployment benefits rejected YET again!!!!!

Discussion in 'Economics' started by S2007S, Jun 29, 2010.

  1. S2007S


    Over 1 million have lost benefits since May and nearly a quarter of a million people will lose them each week moving forward if nothing gets done by this week. Seems they are trying very hard to pass yet another extension and trying extremely hard to get it passed as early as Thursday.

    House rejects extension of unemployment benefits
    AP - Tue Jun 29th, 2010 8:17 PM EDT

    WASHINGTON - With Republicans citing concerns about the growing national debt, the House rejected a bill Tuesday to extend unemployment benefits for people who have been out of work for long stretches.

    The House, however, is expected to vote on the bill again as early as Wednesday. And Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid filed a motion Tuesday evening to force a vote by Thursday to extend the benefits.

    Without an extension, payments would continue to phase out for more than 200,000 people a week. The last extension expired at the end of May. House Democrats said more than 1 million people have already lost benefits.

    Congressional Democrats have been trying for weeks to pass the extension as part of a larger tax and spending package, but the larger bill stalled in the Senate . On Tuesday, House Democrats brought up a standalone bill on unemployment benefits.

    Democrats brought up the bill under a special procedure in which no amendments were allowed and debate was limited. Under the procedure, the bill needed a two-thirds majority to pass. The vote was 261-155, short of the two-thirds needed.

    House Democrats now plan to bring up the bill again under regular business, in which the bill would need only a simple majority to pass, said Rep. Sander Levin , D-Mich., chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee.

    Levin said he expects the House to vote on the bill again Wednesday. In Tuesday's vote, nearly all Democrats voted in favor of the bill, while most Republicans opposed it.

    "America's unemployed workers cannot wait any longer for us to do the right thing," said Rep. Jim McDermott , D-Wash., chairman of the House Ways and Means subcommittee on income security.

    The measure would provide up to 99 weekly unemployment checks averaging $335 to people whose 26 weeks of state-paid benefits have run out. The benefits would have been available through the end of November, at a cost of $33.9 billion. There were no offsets in the bill, so the cost would have added to the budget deficit .

    " The American people know it isn't right to simply add the cost of this spending to our already overdrawn national credit card ," said Rep. Dave Camp of Michigan, the top Republican on the Ways and Means Committee. "They want to help those in need but also know that someone has to pay when government spends money."

    Republicans accused Democrats of playing politics with the measure, since they could have brought up the bill Tuesday in regular order and passed it with a simple majority.

    In the Senate , Democratic leaders were working Tuesday evening to build support for a bill that would extend the unemployment benefits and give homebuyers an extra three months to complete their purchases and qualify for a generous tax break.

    Under current law, homebuyers who signed purchase agreements by April 30 must close on their new homes by Wednesday to qualify for credits of up to $8,000. Democrats hope to pick up Republican support for the bill by combining the two provisions.

    With his motion, Reid , D-Nev., sought to end debate and get a vote on the bill — if Democrats can round up 60 votes to overcome a filibuster . Sen. Olympia Snowe , R-Maine, has said she would support a standalone bill to extend unemployment benefits. Democrats would need at least two Republican votes — and support from the entire Democratic caucus — to overcome a filibuster in the Senate.

    It's a tough vote for some lawmakers who want to help constituents hit hard by the recession but are wary of being labeled big spenders. The economy is starting to pick up, but unemployment is still high as the nation continues to struggle from the loss of more than 8 million jobs. At the same time, angst over deficit spending is growing as midterm congressional elections near in November.

    "We are a community of people. When people lose their jobs and can't find them, we don't stand and simply stand idly by," Levin said.

    Rep. Kevin Brady , R-Texas, said, "People are frightened by the amount of debt this country owes."
  2. Maybe these "victims" need to finally get off of their fat asses and find work?
  3. Retief


    Either that or go out and steal something. Why be a victim when you can be a perp?
  4. + 1

  5. MattF


    So the House already passed a bill extending the housing closing credit....

    So who's playing who and what exactly is in these bills (since it's never just "one or two items")?
  6. rc8222


    I can't wait for the GOP to pick up more seats in the House & Senate in November, and put a stop to all this out of control spending. Millions of the jobs lost are "NEVER" coming back. We can't keep paying these unemployment subsidies forever. After the elections on November 2nd, this free spending crap will be immediately stopped.
  7. Just to put things in perspective.

    Iraq and Afghanistan both have about 33,000,000 people.
    We have spent over a trillion dollars there...

    Over $15,000 per foreign citizen paid from US funds for essentially free protection.
  8. TGregg


    Criticism of Obama is racist, you know. ;)
  9. I bet we spend 10x times more a year protecting foreign countries and thier interests, providing aid (ie 400M to gaza) than what we spend on our own citizens.

    Why is it republicans have huge outcry's when it comes to taking care of our own but not handing money to protect South Korea, Israel,etc..
  10. There was a guy who owns a large family owned bakery in St. Louis on TV yesterday. He said he's looking to hire, but people won't take the job... "because their unemployment checks are only $30-$40 less than the job".

    Perhaps unemployment compensation is so generous that it discourages people from working. ??

    Cut off those fat government checks and perhaps people will decide to work again.
    #10     Jun 30, 2010