Eh, no, you and our froggy friend are wrong. Using “gross negligence” would have contradicted not pursuing charges. And, it is not “uberpartisan” to agree with the conclusion of the Clinton investigation because it’s a reasonable conclusion. You’re just saying it was the wrong edit because you’re an “uberidiot.” Try thinking instead of arguing.
I would be very interested in any information you can share that shows McCabe slow walked any Huma Aberdeen emails.
He sat on them for a month. You have my assurances that the IG will raise it as an issue or a special counsel. No need to thank me for informing you at this time. Unless, as I said, a special prosecutor is appointed in the meantime and that info is not released because it is part of an active investigation. Either way, over the long run, I stand by the fact that it will surface as an issue under investigation or already having been under investigation by the IG.
Annoy you how, UsefulIdiot? By rubbing your nose in your abject stupidity and total ignorance of a matter that you keep weighing in on? Here it is -- you said it, so own it, snowflake:
You came up with that all by yourself? Why the hell do you think they changed it? Or maybe you missed my first four posts on that. Get a clue, man. Take the training wheels off.
So long, Poindexter. If we ou want my attention with your next moniker try saying something interesting or intelligent.