Sorry, “Fact checking” organizations are not credible. What is credible is a court hearing with evidence presented, considered, and a ruling rendered. If a ruling is contrary to legal procedures, as may be seen with a partisan judge, the plaintiff may appeal that judgement to a higher court. Biased media opinions are not going to cut it on a issue as important as an election.
The intended audience for my posts is larger than one person. I love trolls. I really do, because refuting their garbage gives our movement additional credibility. Further, my mind is often stimulated by new ideas when engaging with trolls. As you may have noticed, I went after a couple racists on this site several times who said they supported Trump because their garbage is contrary to what Trump is really about.
So, it's Ok to ruin My Saturday Briefly, Trump's campaign sued in Trial Court to be able to stand closer to the ballot canvassing in Philly. The trial court turned them down and ruled in favor of the election board that wanted to maintain a 20 foot distance for all observers (both parties by statute). The Trump folks appealed to the Commonwealth Court and got the low courts ruling reversed. The Appeals court ruled that observers could stand as close as 6 feet. The elections board then appealed the Commonwealth Court's decision to the State Supreme Court, hoping to get the Commonwealth court's decision over turned, and be able to retain their 20 foot distance requirement. Apparently the The State Supreme Court however ruled against the election board and upheld the Commonwealth court's decision or else the Supreme Court turned down the elction board's appeal. (We don't have here the decision from the Supreme Court, but it is well known the the elections board is being required to allow observers access up to 6 feet.) Regardless the reusult was that the Philly elections board was required to allow all observers (both parties) to stand as close as 6 feet from the counters. None of this ever had anything to do with GOP observers not being allowed to observe in preference to Democrat observers. Both parties and all candidates have observational access according to statute. The rules were, have always been, and remain the same for Democratic and Republican observers.
I was never banned. The purpose for my new account was to create a more positive sounding handle. Are you attempting to lie in one day more than Trump has lied in his lifetime?
See the link I gave to the Court Filing. The fact checking is not inconsistent with the ruling of the Commonwealth Court which was not overturned by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. Furthermore access to ballot "Canvassing" is, by statute!, identical for both parties and all candidates! You're wasting your time to keep beating this dead horse. See also my last post in response to Tsing where I review the case. It is just pure bullshit to assert that observation of Canvassing in Philly was asymmetrical with respect to political parties. Drop it! You'll make a fool of yourself if you persist with this. One of the greatest mistakes anyone can make is to believe anything Donald Trump says without thoroughly checking it out. He's a pathological liar. His lies are intentional. They are directed at those such as yourself. Don't be a fool. Think for yourself.
It is irrelevant how many votes have swung in the past if tens or hundreds of thousands of fraudulent ballots are introduced into the count. Again, look at Wisconsin. At a couple of points during the counting process, Biden gained more votes than were counted as seemingly indicated my the relative difference of the percentage of votes cast between updates. The above is a serious indication of fraud and must be addressed to give the US 2020 Presidental election any credibility at all.
My focus is on Wisconsin. Have yet to hear anyone addressing this in a rational manner. Does the Trump team know about Wisconsin? Have they even filed at lawsuit there?
Learn to Google. https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...528162-1ea1-11eb-90dd-abd0f7086a91_story.html President Trump’s reelection campaign said Wednesday that it would launch a legal blitz to try to halt vote-counting in Pennsylvania and Michigan, would seek a recount in Wisconsin and challenged the handling of ballots in Georgia, threatening to draw out the final results of the razor-thin White House contest. In Wisconsin, Elections Commission Administrator Meagan Wolfe rejected the idea that there have been irregularities in the state’s count, telling reporters that the election “proceeded in a very normal fashion.” Wisconsin officials said all of the state’s 1,850 local clerks completed an initial count of in-person and absentee ballots Wednesday and had started conducting local canvassing of results to double-check their findings. Wolfe’s comments to reporters came after Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien said in a statement that the campaign would request an immediate recount of the vote in Wisconsin, citing “reports of irregularities in several Wisconsin counties which raise serious doubts about the validity of the results.” Wolfe said the counting had gone exceptionally smoothly and that to suggest otherwise was an “insult” to election workers who had prepared carefully for the day. She noted that the counting process was open to the public from start to finish and that some localities even live-streamed images of their absentee ballot-counting. “There are no dark corners or locked doors in elections,” she said. “Anyone was free to watch.”
Trump won Wisconsin in 2016 by 20,000 votes. Nobody claimed it was a fraud. What you are claiming as proof of fraud is not at all proof of fraud. There are mistakes made in reporting by all sorts of people. One such mistake was a clerk mistyping a number by a factor of 10. I actually think given the scope of operations the level of errors is so small it's impressive. What you are not understanding is the mail-in votes were always going be heavily Biden. Even the networks refused to give Trump Penn when he was up 1.1 million votes. If you don't want such wild swings on election night, you needed to allow the counting of mail-in to occur before election night. And Trump and gang actually prevented that from happening in Penn via his lawyers. I'm going to say it again. There is no serious indication of fraud at all. Go ahead, find it. So far, nobody has done so. What we have seen is numerous lawsuits and statements from Trump that have already been debunked with proof. But you want to believe them on the other stuff ? When this is done, I doubt even one case of fraud is found. I expect in a few months you'll admit you were wrong if you have any integrity. Trump will never admit he lost; it's not in his DNA to admit failure.