Ok, we've doubled the number of mail in votes. Let's be generous and, not double, not triple, but quadruple the number of frauds. What is the historical rate of fraud multiplied by four? 0.0012%?
What? Are you really trying to argue that lack of evidence does not mean there is no evidence because of partisan suspicions? You state “there is certainly fraud.” I am aware of two instances of attempted fraud this election, one in Nevada where a lady tried to vote twice and another in Pennsylvania where a man tried to vote for his deceased mother. In both cases, one of which the GOP tried to use in their Nevada suit, was both people who were voting for Trump. You cannot be certain without proof. You suspect. Now ask yourself what are really these basis of your suspicions. Unless of course you can produce some proof - which I will gladly review. Next you cite an case in Philadelphia where poll watchers were granted the right to physically observe, which they were granted and followed as determined by a court. Now the city had to move scanning machines to accommodate the watchers court ordered space, then they complained about that. Again, no proof here just twisting the facts and taking positions out of context to make untrue statements seem true. Out of state Nevada voters. These voters are identifiable in the GOP lawsuit as having zip codes that end in AE AA AR. These are codes for overseas Americans such as business professionals and military who still legally reside in America. For Example, AE means American in Europe, AA American in Asia. Please stop.
I do agree, the whole system needs major improvement. Voting should be secure and simple for all citizens. Like that in some of those hated socialist countries of Europe.
Perhaps... but requiring a notairzation is impossible. let's not forget the people living and serving overseas... people living in remote areas of the country, people living in the city....notarization is just not feasable.
A judge in Philadelphia today asked the Republican lawyer if there were any Republican observers in the room while the votes were being counted. The Republican lawyer's answer: “There’s a non-zero number of people in the room.” 'Nuff said.
This thread is full of a lot of ignorance based on people making guesses when answers are readily available. You can read the law suits yourselves. Stop relying on the media. Go to the primary sources.
There were also republican vigilante poll watchers trying record ballots with voter information in Michigan who tried to sue because they were blocked from recording.