Unarmed black man? Shoot 7 times in the back.Armed white kid? Give him some water.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by exGOPer, Aug 26, 2020.

  1. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    To add, these 'protecting property' excuse is bullshit, its not about property, it's about power. They want to intimidate protesters, not protect anything.
     
    #41     Aug 27, 2020
  2. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    It is clear now that Blue Lives Matter is engaging in terrorist activity and should be treated as the terrorist organization that it is.
     
    #42     Aug 27, 2020
  3. LacesOut

    LacesOut

    This thread is full of absolute Leftard garbage. Hard to believe you losers actually believe what you say. But the 10% fringe exists on both sides and that’s who met out in the field of battle today.

    Stupid anarchist Biden voters burned down a few buildings and knocked out a few old shopkeepers.
    Underage MAGA fan got a few Antifa scalps.
    Libtards are burning a dozen cities to the ground.

    As I said - This shit ain’t gonna fly in the Midwest.
     
    #43     Aug 27, 2020
  4. Good1

    Good1

    You're really working overtime to spin this. Do you have footage of the very first encounter between the Burnt Businesses Don't Matter crowd and the ideologically motivated kid?

    Theres a difference between fleeing a scene and seeking safe ground to stand on when witnesses turn into a mob. It's justified to retreat , rather than encounter yet another need (or perceived need) to open fire again to avoid a lynching that may or may not be justified. By retreating he spared potentially several lives.

    Bum rushing a downed man is life threatening when there are 20 Biden voters behind you. Each one rushing in is armed with everyone else rushing in with lethal consequences if they can disarm a downed man. Rushing in, there is no requirement to distinquish whether anyone is carrying a knife or gun. A foot is lethal and disarmament is lethal. So why would you think it justified to even try to disarm someone who is clearly trying to avoid you and the mob behind you? If the first shooting was justified then certainly was the next three. If the first was not justified then it is also possible rhe next three were justified because you hate still not allowed to take the law into your own hands. You film and you follow at a distance so the perp (if he is a perp) can be identified and apprehended later. With a mob behind you, you are only justified to disarm if the carrier is attacking you. The boy on the ground was not attacking anyone at that moment. And if you are a mob that isn't even supposed to be there, you better have proof you ate the victim of an attack.

    Sounds like the first rioter to be shot in the head was an aggressor too? Your argument is yah, he was aggressing but not too much?
     
    #44     Aug 27, 2020
  5. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    witnesses saw a potential mass shooter situation, they acted in self defense
     
    #45     Aug 27, 2020
  6. Good1

    Good1

    Or, the kid is saying he's not intimidated by the intimidators who are burning down businesses. Open carry is simply a suggestion: 'Please don't burn down or loot anymore business, at least not whete I'm standing". The gun is there to protect the person of any one suggesting that the mob stop intimidating the businesses, and by proxy, everyone one the United States...in every state.
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2020
    #46     Aug 27, 2020
  7. gaussian

    gaussian

    Hm, seems you're right for once.

    Here's the real hot take:

    If leftist governors didn't approve this by virtue of doing nothing, and police didn't stand down, we wouldn't get more extremists. Extremism begets extremism. Congratulations the two ends of the horseshoe connected for once. When a BLM protest disobeys curfew the first night deploy tear gas. Second night initiate martial law and arrest anyone out after 7pm at gunpoint. Arresting these terrorists with extreme prejudice should make BLM happy. The police, DHS, and National Guard can do their job and clean up the agitators so the real protesters can have their voices heard unimpeded.

    If you truly believe these protests are 1A protests then this shouldn't be a problem for you. A 1A protest shouldn't result in millions of dollars in damage and several deaths where ever it goes. That would be called an "insurrection" and the legal term for that is "very not cool".


    Weird hot take. Almost as weird as listening to all of the terrorist BLM members cry "someone call the police" when homeboy got his wig split.
     
    #47     Aug 27, 2020
  8. Good1

    Good1

    Not even Biden's Life Matters rioters are that stupid. Everyone knows what a standing militia is or does when they open carry. Disarm them if you actually are that stupid...especially if you are participating with a mob whose purpose is to intimidate. Your stupidity does not justify your attack.
     
    #48     Aug 27, 2020
  9. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    You can't even argue without calling them 'Biden Rioters' or 'Burnt businesesses blah blah' but it's me who is trying to spin this?

    Incel cuck with white supremacist militia links travels to another state, murders locals, police do nothing and it's not his fault?
     
    #49     Aug 27, 2020
  10. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    MAGAtard police chiefs are asking their forces to "stand down" to curve "defunding" talks of local politicians. Get that story right. Yes, we've been saying Trump's rhetoric begets extremism for 5 yrs. now

    was he or was he not militia? Make up your mind. The dynamics of "a standing militia" changed after the first head shot, it became an active shooter situation at that point.
     
    #50     Aug 27, 2020