UK Proposes All Paychecks Go to the State First

Discussion in 'Economics' started by Tom B, Sep 20, 2010.

  1. Tom B

    Tom B

    Let's hope this never happens in the US.

    UK Proposes All Paychecks Go to the State First

    Published: Monday, 20 Sep 2010 | 7:57 AM ET
    By: Robin Knight
    CNBC Associate Web Producer

    The UK's tax collection agency is putting forth a proposal that all employers send employee paychecks to the government, after which the government would deduct what it deems as the appropriate tax and pay the employees by bank transfer.

    The proposal by Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) stresses the need for employers to provide real-time information to the government so that it can monitor all payments and make a better assessment of whether the correct tax is being paid.

    Currently employers withhold tax and pay the government, providing information at the end of the year, a system know as Pay as You Earn (PAYE). There is no option for those employees to refuse withholding and individually file a tax return at the end of the year.

    If the real-time information plan works, it further proposes that employers hand over employee salaries to the government first.

    "The next step could be to use (real-time) information as the basis for centralizing the calculation and deduction of tax," HMRC said in a July discussion paper.

    HMRC described the plan as "radical" as it would be a huge change from the current system that has been largely unchanged for 66 years.

    Even though the centralized deductions proposal would provide much-needed oversight, there are some major concerns, George Bull, head of Tax at Baker Tilly, told CNBC.com.

    "If HMRC has direct access to employees' bank accounts and makes a mistake, people are going to feel very exposed and vulnerable," Bull said.

    And the chance of widespread mistakes could be high, according to Bull. HMRC does not have a good track record of handling large computer systems and has suffered high-profile errors with data, he said.

    The system would be massive in terms of data management, larger than a recent attempt to centralize the National Health Service's data, which was later scrapped, Bull said.

    If there's a mistake and the HMRC collects too much money, the difficulty of getting it back could be high with repayments of tax taking weeks or months, he said.

    "There has to be some very clear understanding of how quickly repayments were made if there was a mistake," Bull said.

    HMRC estimated the potential savings to employers from the introduction of the concept would be about £500 million ($780 million).

    But the cost of implementing the new system would be "phenomenal," Bull pointed out.

    "It's very clear that the system does need to be modernized… It's outdated, it's outmoded," Emma Boon, campaigner manager at the Tax Payers' Alliance, told CNBC.com.

    Boon said that the Tax Payers' Alliance was in favor of simplifying tax collection, but stressed that a new complex computer system would add infrastructure and administration costs at a time when the government is trying to reduce spending.

    There is a further concern, according to Bull. The centralized storage of so much data poises a security risk as the system may be open to cyber crime.

    As well as security issues, there's a huge issue of transparency, according to Boon.

    Boon also questioned HMCR's ability to handle to the role effectively.

    The Institute of Directors (IoD), a UK organization created to promote the business agenda of directors and entreprenuers, said in a press release it had major concerns about the proposal to allow employees' pay to be paid directly to HMRC.

    The IoD said the shift to a real-time, centralized system could be positive as long as the burden on employers was not increased. But it added that the idea of wages being processed by HMRC was "completely unacceptable."

    “This document contains a lot of good ideas. But the idea that HMRC should be trusted with the gross pay of employees is not one of them," Richard Baron, Head of Taxation at the IoD, said in the release.

    A spokesperson for Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne was not immediately available for comment.
    © 2010 CNBC.com

    http://www.cnbc.com/id/39265847
     
  2. What if somebody else figures out how to cleanout the employers'/employees' bank accounts just before pay day?

    Elimination of cash in Sweden. Paycheck garnished in UK.

    What's next?

    Some "life designation" brand when you're born?
    Embedded microchip?
    Forced age of death? Kill 'em off at 79?
     
  3. LEAPup

    LEAPup

    Total insanity!
     
  4. Well thats what happens when GOVERNMENTS no longer FEAR their citizenry!!! :eek:

    Citizens with NO GUNS means eventual citizens with no PAYCHECKS.......you gotta fricking LOVE how history just keeps repeating over and over again, and the timid and docile masses just don't GET IT! :eek:
     
  5. Lets have a worldwide revolution. I am tired of this shit and some people need to be executed.
     
  6. When the government takes your entire paycheck, imagine the possibilities... overdue books at the library, speeding and parking tickets, court fines, estimated taxes. All will be paid in full immediately. Too bad about your house payment.


    The ''S'' word is a process...
     
  7. LEAPup

    LEAPup

    I agree 100%!

    Slick Willy Clinton banned military style rifles, magazines that held over ten rounds, etc., back in 1994. Thank God Bush let it expire. None the less, if Odumba even hints of trying to pull the same sh*t, I would imagine the dumbocrats would be complete toast in November. The dumbs are toast in November anyway, but this one would seal their fate.

    Looking back at history, once Hitler disarmed people, they went from Citizens to Subjects. At that point, the government could do ANYTHING they wanted...
     
  8. Slick Willy Clinton banned military style rifles, magazines that held over ten rounds, etc., back in 1994. Thank God Bush let it expire. None the less, if Odumba even hints of trying to pull the same sh*t, I would imagine the dumbocrats would be complete toast in November. The dumbs are toast in November anyway, but this one would seal their fate.

    _______________________________________________________

    Come on down to Texas. Plenty of AKs and AR15s with plenty of Magazines pilled high by honest citizens. Texas is and will always be ready to defend its rights and state rights.

    What is happening in the UK is to no fault but the citizens. They were willing to give up more rights than they could obtain and now...the UK GOV. sees them as weak.

    I doubt that such a "Move" by the UK gov. will be put in place. If anything, it will wake up and shake up the smart Citizen's of the UK.

    Much like our Gov. has in the US.
     
  9. I agree 100%. The garbage should be cleared/burnt.
     
  10. LEAPup

    LEAPup

    I LOVE Texas!!!! I'd love to have about 100 acres in a rural part of the state.

    Texas has to be the last true American state that resembles what our Founding Fathers originally intended the US to be.

    If Texas ever broke away from the union, I'd be glad to move to the Country of Texas!
     
    #10     Sep 20, 2010