U.S. Ambassador killed in Libya

Discussion in 'Politics' started by CaptainObvious, Sep 12, 2012.

  1. i dont care about muslims that much. if there was a way to pinpoint who did this i say take them out.
    i am looking at it from the point of what it does to us. what does it do to us to become murderers of innocent women and children. what does it do to us to become embroiled in another religious war like iraq.
     
    #51     Sep 12, 2012
  2. you are the one advocating terrorism as revenge for terrorism. that makes us terrorists.



    Ronald Reagan. .... retaliation in which innocent civilians are killed is “itself a terrorist act
     
    #52     Sep 12, 2012
  3. yea that will learn 'em.. lol. This shit wouldn't happen ANYWHERE in Western civ. This is an act of war. I'm not saying we should just indiscriminately bomb the place but these people need to be held responsible. Murders of US citizens overseas CANNOT be tolerated. They were serving our country, it isn't like they were there illegally. Libya needs to conduct an investigation and the US military needs to be part of it. The parties involved need to be arrested and punished. If not, then it really does appear that we just can't coexist. Seriously fuck the ME, no more aid, no more help with anything.
     
    #53     Sep 12, 2012
  4. There are no innocent civilians, for them or us. There are only those that survive and those that don't. Nobody get's to be neutral in my world. Pick a side and fight it out. Winner take all.
     
    #54     Sep 12, 2012
  5. You need to meditate on that statement for a much deeper truth.
     
    #55     Sep 12, 2012
  6. Killing an ambassador is a big deal. We all know if this was any other president, there would have been serous repercussions. At the very least, a kill squad sent in to eliminate many of the religious leaders, religious leaders who have been now put in the highest echelons of power by Obama's no fly zone nonsense.
     
    #56     Sep 12, 2012
  7. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    And you need to stop medicating yourself from the hospital pharmacy.
     
    #57     Sep 12, 2012
  8. so if someday somebody develops a secret weapon that can take out the us they would be justified in using it? after all winner take all.

    think much?
     
    #58     Sep 12, 2012
  9. All that gloating about killing Gaddafi is suddenly not looking so good.

    Sometimes the devil you know is far better than the one you "unintentionally" unleash.

    The problem I am having is that all of this, in Egypt and Libya and elsewhere, was very predictable. It's not like we didn't have the experience of iran to guide us. yet Obama and Hillary plunged ahead recklessly to pull the rug out from under regimes that were if not our allies, at least coexisting with us peacefully.

    Why would they do that, knowing that radical islamists would undoubtedly come to power and threaten our interests as well as Israel? At some point the line between gross incompetence and treachery begins to blur, since the end results are the same.
     
    #59     Sep 12, 2012
  10. BSAM

    BSAM

    Hmmm...
    I got an idea.
    If no Americans are in these heathen countries, then no Americans get killed there.
    We mind our own business, we save trillions of taxpayer dollars, the deficit slows way down.
    Ah, how silly of me to suggest such a common sense idea.
     
    #60     Sep 12, 2012