Twitter

Discussion in 'Stocks' started by RainMaker3000, Apr 16, 2021.

  1. Does twitter regularly hijack or deny people access to their account on purpose? Is it a tool for the liberal hate machine? If so, extreme times require extreme actions, can they mozel free speech? The question for Twitter is do you value your shareholder's value?
     
    murray t turtle likes this.
  2. ET180

    ET180

    I think you're referring to this:

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/joewal...hreatens-lawsuit-in-response/?sh=5061fdae4aff

    There's also this:



    They are not even trying to hide the censorship anymore. They have confidence that if they can control the narrative (in many cases silence truth) and prevent conservatives from getting elected, then the Dem party will allow them to operate their tech monopoly. It's a quid-pro-quo.
     
    murray t turtle likes this.
  3. %%
    THAT stock +SQ have had some big trends.
    Many ETFs have that in them\ good thing most of them don't overweight it.

    They maybe like us + like bird watching, why else name a co that if they dont like birds??
    Good + great thing about capital markets;
    DuckDuckGo+ others can eat their + FB lunch. NOT a prediction........................................................................
     
  4. Overnight

    Overnight

    It is ironical that FB is censoring posts that may contain "personally identifiable information" that can lead to "physical or financial harm".

    Well, gee, when you sign up with FB, you MUST provide a name and a birthdate. (They do not suggest ANYWHERE using fake names and birthdates). And they ask you to fill in other details such as where you went to school, where you are living, where you work, etc. With just those bits of information, a licensed PI could find you within the day with all of the tools they have available.

    So FB's double standards are just really sad to witness.
     
  5. JSOP

    JSOP

    No it's censoring posts that contains "personal identifiable information" that can lead to the harm of the entities that they need to please.