........ these individuals are mentally unstable and require psychiatric help. http://elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=132135 The sad result of brothers and sisters having children. Or a father "breaking in" his daughter before her boyfriends in high school get to her. Entire southern population with defective genetics. How else can you explain the almost religious fervor that someone making 20K a year screams about "socialism" taking over. Ask any of these imbeciles what "socialism" means. The answers are un-believably stupid.
Not going to argue with you, because I know it's futile. However you did not vote for change. So I find it funny how you bring it up AFTER voting against change.
just read it Makes no sense, blame a child on welfare? dailykos.com and Jed Lewison receive EPIC FAIL "So it turns out that when Plumber Joe was a child, he was on welfare, not once, but twice, and he credits it with helping his family ultimately lead a middle-class life style. He defends having received welfare by saying that he's subsequently paid into the system. In other words, well-designed taxpayer-funded social assistance programs are fine because ultimately they will pay for themselves." Suddenly we have Joe The Reasonable, right? Well, not exactly. Plumber Joe has got something of a tax dodging problem. In the end, he's just another typical Republican hypocrite.
It was brilliant. In the end, McCain was claiming that HE was the agent of change. If Obama had said "Progress" (aka change for the better), then you lot would have made the following 'equation': progress = Progressive = Lefty/Liberal = Commie Pinko Subversive You tried to do that anyway but you skipped a few steps and so failed to connect with the general public, who looked around themselves and didn't like what they saw so "Change" sounded pretty damn good. It's pretty hard to argue that "Change" is pure lefty philosophy when the right is arguing for "change" as well. Brilliant.
well certainly not the entire "southern population" ... that's too braod of a generalizaiton and no better than what republicans do when they stereotype.
The Repubs like it both ways; a guys friends are fair game if it makes the Dem candidate look bad, but turn the tables and it becomes an unfair attack of the liberal press. McCain picked Joe to be a MAJOR symbol of his campaign, Joe agreed, and that made him fair game just like Ayer's etc. Seneca