Trying to post charts

Discussion in 'Journals' started by TonySanDiego, Jul 13, 2002.

  1. Thanks nkhoi,

    I'll check it out.
     
    #11     Jul 14, 2002
  2. here is the same screen using Snagit for capture
     
    #12     Jul 14, 2002
  3. looks much better, thanks nkhoi for the Snagit suggestion.

    Needs a bit more work on sizing. I think I will just post the entire length of the day, and use the scroll bars to view back and forth.

    I'll try it and see how it works.
     
    #13     Jul 14, 2002
  4. ANCHOR

    ANCHOR

    This long chart is kinda cool. You can scroll along and watch where you enter your trades and then scroll farther and see if they work out or not.
     
    #14     Jul 14, 2002
  5. nkhoi

    nkhoi

    sample of using snagit studio edit feature to edit multiple pictures at one
     
    #15     Jul 14, 2002
  6. I'll study up on using Snagit Studio when get a chance.

    For now, I am content to get a nice clean capture out of Qcharts.

    here are my adventures in COF.


    (it is good to try to explain to all of you why I did what I did.)
     
    • cof.gif
      File size:
      27.6 KB
      Views:
      112
    #16     Jul 14, 2002
  7. and an ill timed Home Depot short. :(
     
    • hd.gif
      File size:
      18.6 KB
      Views:
      111
    #17     Jul 14, 2002
  8. nkhoi

    nkhoi

    HD monthly 1 finger salute pattern
     
    • hd.gif
      File size:
      14.8 KB
      Views:
      115
    #18     Jul 14, 2002
  9. on the HD, the break that you chose to short came quite soon after it had already made its largest move down so far that day, so it was a bit of a chase. If you want to look for new lows to short, a breakdown of a sideways consolidation or a double-bottom failure is always a bit safer, with better risk/reward. The break of the "double bottom" between 2:15 and 2:30 (tough to make chart calls on such short time frames) was a much more reliable pattern to short; by 2:45, you already had a volume surge into fresh lows and by that time its really too late.
     
    #19     Jul 14, 2002
  10. illiquid,

    Thanks, you have given me 2 key points to consider.

    Double bottom failures (and double top "failures") are undoubtedly good entries. (and triple tops/bottoms failures)

    Also the point that you don't want the breakout/breakdown to come after too long a run. I had written a similar thought down this afternoon as I was trying to write up my entry rules. But I hadn't really thought of it the way you expressed it.

    Valuable stuff here.
     
    #20     Jul 15, 2002