“ Trump’s Defense Secretary Accidentally Texted War Plans to The Atlantic..”

Discussion in 'Politics' started by TrailerParkTed, Mar 24, 2025.

  1. smallfil

    smallfil

    This is no warplan and what was discussed was general terms or maybe, methods. It did not reveal the actual targets and the means used to destroy them as a real military plan would contain. Goldstein also, had a reputation of lying multiple times. So, on credibility alone, he fails. Someone suggested he could have just shut his mouth and then, criticized the so called chat members for what they said on the chat. Instead, he outed himself.
     
    #111     Mar 27, 2025
  2. Ricter

    Ricter

    Do tell us about your experience making war plans. Otherwise, we'll have to take that assessment from the people who make war plans.

    Your rant about Goldberg is a red herring.
     
    #112     Mar 27, 2025
    wrbtrader likes this.
  3. wrbtrader

    wrbtrader

    Yeah and when they text their plans to "Invade Canada and Greenland"...the idiots will show up to say there was "No War Plans".

    It's no different than someone sending a text to the White House that writes "I am going to blow up your house with you in it".

    The police show up to arrest the guy for making a threat and he responds to the police by saying "I never said the words I was going to KILL or HURT someone".

    For what its worth, we recently had three ET members (e.g. echo..., vz...and someone else who disappeared as quickly as he had showed up) who argue that when a country drops bombs on another country...it's WAR.

    I had argued that only Congress can declare WAR on another country but without Congress making that declaration...the act of shooting missiles at someone is an act of WAR regardless if the two countries had declared war or not. :rolleyes:

    If there's no declaration of WAR and a country is busy dropping bombs on someone...the country or group of people will view it as an act of WAR regardless how others want to frame it as WAR, CONFLICT, ARMED ATTACK, FIGHTING, ASSAULT, WARFARE, BATTLE, CONFLICT, ACT of TERROR or FEUD.

    I've seen all the above words used by people playing semantics in trying to explain someone's cognitive structure of the meaning of the action by a country.

    Trump did the same semantics game during his campaign when he said he's a President of Peace and that there were no WARS in the world when he was President when in reality there were +150 military conflicts in the world during his first term as President in which over 200k people (soldiers a civilians) were killed.

    Further, for the past few centuries...the world has NEVER had a year with less than 100 military conflicts. That's an amazing number to show how the world is incapable of peace...we just do not fucking get along with each other.

    I will say it again...

    Historical Trend:

    Even in previous decades, armed conflicts were frequent, rarely falling below 100, and there has been no year without armed conflict for centuries.​

    Today, Trump is talking about buying another democratic country who has shown no military aggression towards the United States or invading another country if necessary by military force.

    I'm confident if Trump orders our U.S. Armed Forces to invade Greenland or Canada...Trump and his goons will play the semantics game that it's not and act of WAR and there were "No WAR Plans"...

    considering Trump strongly believes he can invade another country to take their mineral resources under the facade its a strategic strategy to protect America without the approval of our Congress because he thinks he's above the law as a 34x convicted felon elected as President of the United States.​

    Trump will argue it's what the American people voted for while forgetting he promised to end wars because he's a "President of Peace".

    P.S. I'm not defending the Houthis. They deserve what they got for attacking our naval ships and naval ships of our allies in the Red Sea...they are a terrorist rebel group located in Yemen while escalating the conflict in the Middle East.

    wrbtrader
     
    Last edited: Mar 27, 2025
    #113     Mar 27, 2025
    Ricter and Tuxan like this.
  4. Tuxan

    Tuxan

    I have him on ignore but clicked show ignore... A mistake.

    Retarded is truly not a figure of speech with him. I love the bit that Goldstein has a "reputation for lying several times". This goes back to 2020 because of reporting the "suckers and losers" cemetery comments made by Trump. This was firstly reported as anonymous but then was backed up by none other that Trump's White House Chief of Staff, General John Kelly.

    Most of the dumbasses have never even held a copy of The Atlantic monthly. We had loads of antique copies around the house when I was a kid.

    original (1).jpg

    25c in 1857 is equivalent to $9.13 in 2025.

    We had a few copies of "The Galaxy" monthly too, which was even older but bought and absorbed by The Atlantic.
     
    Last edited: Mar 27, 2025
    #114     Mar 27, 2025
  5. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    #115     Mar 27, 2025
    faet likes this.
  6. Tuxan

    Tuxan

  7. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

  8. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    #118     Mar 28, 2025
    Covertibility likes this.
  9. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    #119     Apr 21, 2025
    Covertibility likes this.
  10. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    #120     Apr 21, 2025
    Covertibility likes this.