so all that time for months if not a year or two you were telling us your polls were good because they picked the winner in 2012... you were just bullshitting over and over? for instance.. "Thats right jem,the polls you consider garbage picks the eventual winner in the majority of their polls"
The American people don't like Trump.Millions more people voted for Hillary and out of more than 80 approval ratings polls since he has been President only Rasmussen has had him reaching a 50 % approval rating.
I don't remember those specific conversations or there context but I agree the polls pick the winner the majority of the time. If the 90 % odds of the popular vote winner winning the election had happened in 2016 the polls would have been right in picking the winner in 2016.
watching you bullshit on this subject is fun. the polls did not pick the winner and they had hillary up by huge margins. you are just about the only person in the country saying the polls were good. you are entertaining. by the way... hillary probably got millions of illegal votes http://www.dailywire.com/news/12760...s-study-claims-millions-john-nolte#exit-modal ... Notice, though, how across all of these media outlets, everyone is on the exact same page in their panicked rush to shut down debate by declaring Trump a liar, and a liar with "zero evidence." It all seems kinda coordinated, no? And then Phase II inevitably begins, the release of the BigThink pieces that utilize words like "dangerous." You see, if you question the science PEOPLE COULD BE HURT, so you better shut your fat mouth. SPONSORED CONTENT [paste:font size="5"]a little over two years ago: In a forthcoming article in the journal Electoral Studies, we bring real data from big social science survey datasets to bear on the question of whether, to what extent, and for whom non-citizens vote in U.S. elections. Most non-citizens do not register, let alone vote. But enough do that their participation can change the outcome of close races. … How many non-citizens participate in U.S. elections? More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples indicated that they were registered to vote. Furthermore, some of these non-citizens voted. Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010. Because non-citizens tended to favor Democrats (Obama won more than 80 percent of the votes of non-citizens in the 2008 CCES sample), we find that this participation was large enough to plausibly account for Democratic victories in a few close elections. It is a fascinating study based on something called "self-reporting," which means that non-citizens admitted to voting illegally. And the study was conducted by… Jesse Richman is Associate Professor of Political Science and International Studies at Old Dominion University, and Director of the ODU Social Science Research Center. David Earnest is Associate Professor of Political Science and International Studies at Old Dominion University, and Associate Dean for Research & Graduate Studies in the College of Arts and Letters. Using the widely disputed Left/MSM number of 11 million illegals, this particular study claims that millions of illegal votes could have been cast during the 2008 presidential election. When you consider the focus on Hispanic turnout during the 2016 election, combined with all the talk about border walls and racism, and no less than President Obama reassuring illegals they could flood the polls without fearing any consequence… Well, you fill in the blank. Now, is this particular study disputed? Yes. Very much so. And that's fine. In fact, that's healthy. Disputes are good. I'm an American, which means I like disputes and debate and alternate points of view. My problem is that Phil Rucker and Jake Tapper and PolitiFact, and all of the rest of the national media, are trying to snuff out debate by LYING. Outright, flat-out LYING.
ha,ha, This is how his threads always go. He starts out with some left wing headline and expects it to sway us all now that we see that experts are disagreeing with us, and then as someone doesn't bite it hook line and sinker like a democrat would, he gets all tangled up into some detail which the astute poster so kindly pointed out. Same with the other guy and his weather.
Again...all those "millions of more votes" came from a 75 mile radius in Southern California. Tell me...where do most illegal aliens live? Oh that's right...in the same area.
Oops your precious Gallup Poll showed Trump at 35% approval rating but even now with that garbage biased poll he is now at 42%--What now???
Trumps current Gallup approval rating is 41% and his first term average approval is 40%.Congrats if you think that is a good thing