Their last poll had Hillary + 2 though.Thats the game Rasmussen plays.Months leading up to the election they have trump ahead,than the last poll prior to the election they do a real poll showing Hillary was in the lead like most other polls than they can claim to be right,although they were wrong for months leading up to the election.
In spite of the media and their polls all being either mistakenly or intentionally skewed and even though the polls were right and more people voted for Hillary he still won. Is there anything Trump can't do?
Right, but all the other polls had Hillary up like 10 points the months leading up to the election so they were kinda doing the same thing, don't you think?
accept that is a misrepresentation. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...s_clinton_vs_johnson_vs_stein-5952.html#polls look at that list on that page. Rasmueseen had hillary up by 1 or 2 much of the time. by your unfounded and silly definition Rasmuessen, USC and IBD maybe gravis were the best in terms of consistently by close to the final totals. you favorite national polls were ridiculously off the mark by having hillary with really larger leads. Any way you look at your favorite lefty polls were terrible. By my definition only the polls which revealed proper templates were ever worth considering.
Most of the polls did not have Hillary up by + 10 and her RCP average was never that high.Her numbers dropped due to Camey announcing she was back under FBI investigation imo,not because the polls were crooked.I find the other polls more credible because even if they were off about how much Hillary was ahead,most polls had her ahead most of the time while the majority of Rasmussen polls had Trump ahead most of the time.
All the polls from Oct 20-24 averaged her up almost 11 points. This was literally less than 3 weeks before the election.
screw the average... Rasmuessen and USC and the good polls were saving the crooked polls. look at your beloved polls from october. that is a lot of double digit leads for clinton So... how can you say these national polls were not crooked when they were using democrat rich samples to skew their results. CNBC 10/21 - 10/24 LV -- 47 37 Clinton +10 LA Times/USC Tracking 10/19 - 10/25 3145 LV 4.5 44 45 Trump +1 USA Today/Suffolk 10/20 - 10/24 1000 LV 3.0 49 39 Clinton +10 Associated Press-GfK 10/20 - 10/24 1212 LV -- 54 41 Clinton +13 Reuters/Ipsos 10/20 - 10/24 1170 LV 3.3 43 37 Clinton +6 ABC News Tracking 10/20 - 10/23 611 LV 4.5 53 41 Clinton +12 Gravis 10/20 - 10/23 2109 RV 2.1 50 50 Tie CNN/ORC 10/20 - 10/23 779 LV 3.5 51 45 Clinton +6 NBC News/SM 10/17 - 10/23 32255 LV 1.0 50 44 Clinton +6 Quinnipiac 10/17 - 10/18 1007 LV 3.1 50 44 Clinton +6 Economist/YouGov 10/15 - 10/18 925 RV 3.9 47 43 Clinton +4 FOX News 10/15 - 10/17 912 LV 3.0 49 42 Clinton +7 Bloomberg 10/14 - 10/17 1006 LV 3.1 50 41 Clinton +9 Reuters/Ipsos 10/13 - 10/17 1190 LV 3.3 43 39 Clinton +4 Monmouth 10/14 - 10/16 726 LV 3.6 53 41 Clinton +12 CBS News 10/12 - 10/16 1189 LV 3.0 51 40 Clinton +11 NBC News/SM 10/10 - 10/16 24804 LV 1.0 51 43 Clinton +8 ABC News/Wash Post 10/10 - 10/13 740 LV 4.0 50 46 Clinton +4 NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 10/10 - 10/13 905 LV 3.3 51 41 Clinton +10 LA Times/USC Tracking 10/9 - 10/15 2946 LV 4.5 44 45 Trump +1 FOX News 10/10 - 10/12 917 LV 3.0 49 41 Clinton +8 NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 10/8 - 10/10 806 LV 3.5 50 40 Clinton +10 Reuters/Ipsos 10/6 - 10/10 2363 LV 2.2 44 37 Clinton +7 NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl 10/8 - 10/9 447 LV 4.6 52 38 Clinton +14 Economist/YouGov 10/7 - 10/8 971 RV 4.2 48 43 Clinton +5 The Atlantic 10/5 - 10/9 886 LV 3.9 49 38 Clinton +11
Yeah,the two RCP polls that had Trump in the lead the most,although he lost by millions of votes,are the good ones