He left on his own will after the "jem" user name flamed out in a horrible crash. He then publicly stated he will "use" another user name but strangely he didn't say he will "create a new" user name. Thus, I was under the impression that "jem" has several old user names that's rarely used or "inactive" until he needed to use one. People have digitial fingerprints and the only one I notice about "jem"...his inability to admit wrong whenever he posted misinformation involving Covid or Vaccines. In fact, he would just ignore when he was called out for the misinformation. If true...that's fucked up. What type of a person puts their mother in a nursing home in another state (Florida) when there are nursing homes in their own state to be close to their mother ? Unless, she had old connections or close friends at that specific nursing home in Florida. As for the 2008, I do know some members from back then that "admitted" they created multiple user names and will use them whenever needed (e.g. banned, ditching a current user name that flamed out, shake people off their ass after they've been a complete asswipe). wrbtrader
Nope, not seeing the connection. Here is the original jem... Here is ipatent... Your claim of jem and ipatent being the same poster seems to be not valid. Jem was created AFTER ipatent.
Maybe ipatent is the origin. Thus, "jem" is a creation of ipatent. I've only seen that once before with someone else named "Gotcha" but it was none of my business about his origin user name years earlier that created the "Gotcha" persona. As long as they don't start playing games and let their racist bullshit and Covid misinformation come to surface as digital footprints that connect these idiots to one user name that's been registered here for many years... I don't have a problem with them nor how many user names they have registered over the years here at ET. jem's flaw is Covid and his inability to admit to misinformation nor acknowledge it when called out is a digital fingerprint to that flaw. wrbtrader
Well... If you knew Jem you would understand ? I'm tired so mayne missing something but 2001 is on most calendars before 2008? I don't think he's Jem really but one cannot be absolutely certain
The thread is about the Arbery killing. Who watched the several hours of defendant testimony besides me and is willing to discuss it, and who is wasting time with baseless allegations involving people who have nothing to do with me?
Yeah, that was my bad, I got confused between the two dates. I'm not even going to edit out the error, because I deserve everyone to see my fubar on mixing up the two. Jem was created before ipatent. I'm not sure what my point was on that one. Mreh.
Sorry man, I got my trial thrill fill watching all that Rittenhouse crap. Ug. Oh, and I did see some of the guy's testimony...He's guilty as sin. You don't lynch a guy because you suspect he's the guy walking through an unfinished house and stole a box of nails. That's Florida, dude!
Well, the press has really focused on that one, including the conservative press like Fox News. The Arbery case is similar in that the story told by the media so far doesn't necessarily match up with the testimony, criminal history and other evidence in the case.