redhats: "You must regulate porn access to minors lest I accuse you of grooming!" "You must do something about this porn my 18yo sweet little angel engaged in and found its way to the web!" also redhats: "OMG, this party w/o power in gov is asking for stolen dick pics to be taken down in the nicest terms. Con speech is being silenced! Elon oppressed!"
You might wanna take up the subject of perversion with H4M. Wasn't he going on about porn for minors just now? Nice try at a deflection though.
Looks like there's more to this than just dick-pics. Classic diversion. Even Andrew on CNBC just said that story shouldn't have been removed. Did they bury influence peddling? Yeah, that's a "nothing burger".
Just noting -- keeping the nudes up without consent violate revenge porn laws in the U.S. Twitter and other social media platforms are required to take them down. Elon Musk's 'Twitter Files' drop revealed some of the tweets the Biden campaign asked the social app to remove were nude photos of Hunter Biden spread without his consent https://www.businessinsider.com/twi...aign-asked-remove-tweets-hunter-biden-2022-12
Well, as Andrew Ross Sorkin pointed out this AM, and I agree, they should have been taken down. (or their links?)... I didn't follow it.... but he also pointed out that the front page article on the NY Post should not have been removed.
redhats try to confound the nudes to the NYPost takedowns and make it a 1st A issue as if the gov ordered the NYPost take downs. Trump nor any state gov. order the NYPost take downs. If twitter tried to pass as a neutral newsource and not a shitposting site, yeah, that would be "morally wrong".
What deflection, there is no evidence that Biden campaign asked the entire story to be censored, you keep avoiding the actual topic with 'NOBODY KNOWS' bullshit.