I call out hypocrisy. Your guy has accumulated nearly 40 indictments and yet you can't go a day without mentioning the black dude. That's your prerogative, but it makes you a hypocrite. If you can live with that... then I certainly can (live with your hypocrisy). You've also stated that the two Supremes make it all worthwhile; regardless of crimes committed. That's just absurd. I have zero respect for anyone holding that position. Peace. https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...ergency-to-stay-in-power.330901/#post-4824949
I'm sorry, what? I can't go a day without mentioning "the black dude"? Are you referring to Obama? Because I don't recall bringing him up today, yesterday, last week, etc. What am I being hypocritical about?
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...ergency-to-stay-in-power.330901/#post-4824949 https://www.elitetrader.com/et/search/8781920/?q=obama&o=date&c[user][0]=137314
Ah, you added a link. So I defended Obama by saying some idiots claimed he would take power and stay in office after his term, and this is somehow hypocritical for me mentioning that Trump is a fucking idiot and abusing his office by threatening Saturday Night Live and this is somehow making me a hypocrite? I honestly have no idea what you are talking about. But whatever. I suck. I'm a hypocrite, I should be kicked...beaten, etc.
C'mon, that's not a defense of Obama. You asked. You apply moral relativism to the nth degree. Ignore all of Trump's crimes, indictments, and Trump's incitements to violence because... Obama? Hillary? When are they gettin' indicted? Ostensibly that is the only empirical proof to which you can validate your argument(s).
It is a defense of Obama when you read the second part, two posts down when AAA tries to justify it: You won't agree, but I believe Hillary would be found to be just as bad, if not worse if she were properly investigated. So yeah, I believe she is the greater of the two evils and Trump is the lesser. You can have/show no respect for/to me for that if you'd like. The difference is that while I do not agree with your perspective, I don't piss on you for it.
I try (in vain) to convert the more rational Trumpers. I've since learned that it's a lost cause. Trump asked Sessions to appoint a Special Prosecutor (his words) to investigate Hillary What gives? Too much love for Hills?
I have no doubt that if a special prosecutor with as much zeal against Hillary as Mueller has against Trump were to be appointed, all sorts of unsavory acts would come to light. But the establishment and deep state loved Hillary, and hates Trump. That alone says a lot to me.
You don't think Starr went after everything he could in that family in those 4 years? Do you think the wrongdoings all happened after when she was SecState? I don't know, I just think they have enough enemies that something would have come out that stuck by now if they were on the same level as Trump in white collar criminal activity.
lol what? So why didn't Sessions appoint one? What about that political hack Whitaker? WTF are you talking about? You had TWO YEARS of total control and nothing?